Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
The Bone & Joint Journal
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 46-B, Issue 1 | Pages 40 - 45
1 Feb 1964
Carter C Wilkinson J

1. General joint laxity affecting more than three joints was found in 7 per cent of normal schoolchildren. Similar laxity was found in fourteen of a random series of forty-eight girls, and in nineteen of twenty-six boys, with non-familial congenital dislocation of the hip. Such laxity was also found in four of seven girls and five of seven boys with familial (first degree relative affected) congenital dislocation of the hip.

2. It is concluded that persistent generalised joint laxity, which is often familial, is an important predisposing factor to congenital dislocation of the hip in boys. It is less important in girls, except perhaps in familial cases, as in girls there is an alternative temporary hormonal cause of joint laxity.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 42-B, Issue 4 | Pages 721 - 727
1 Nov 1960
Carter C Sweetnam R

An inquiry was made of ninety-seven patients with recurrent dislocation of the patella and forty patients with recurrent dislocation of the shoulder to see how often they had a relative similarly affected, and also how often such dislocation is associated with, and perhaps caused by, familial joint laxity.

Ten of those with recurrent dislocation of the patella and two of those with recurrent dislocation of the shoulder were found to have a near relative with a similar dislocation. Familial joint laxity was found in two of the ten families with more than one member affected by recurrent patellar dislocation, and in both those with more than one member with recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Familial joint laxity was also found in two out of twenty patients with recurrent dislocation of the patella who had no family history of similar dislocation; but in none out of twenty patients with recurrent dislocation of the shoulder and who had no family history of similar dislocation.

Familial joint laxity may be the only cause of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder occurring in more than one member of the family. But there are other, as yet undefined, causes of familial recurrent dislocation of the patella.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 42-B, Issue 4 | Pages 669 - 688
1 Nov 1960
Wilkinson J Carter C

1. The histories of 149 patients, coming to the Hospital for Sick Children within the first three years of life with congenital dislocation of the hip (191 dislocated hips), and treated by conservative methods, have been reviewed.

2. The patients with unilateral dislocations (107) have been divided into three groups, according to the angle of slope of the opposite acetabulum. This angle was measured on the first radiograph and related to the mean value for age and sex.

3. The opposite hip was classed as "normal" if the acetabular angle was below or within one standard deviation above the mean for sex and age; as "moderately shallow" if it was between one and two standard deviations above the mean; and as "shallow" if it was over two standard deviations above the mean. This grouping was found to have a direct bearing on the results of conservative treatment in unilateral cases. a) Those with "normal" opposite acetabula–accounting for most of the unilateral cases–responded well. b) Those with "moderately shallow" opposite acetabula responded variably. c) The group with "shallow" opposite acetabula usually failed to respond.

4. Most bilateral dislocations behaved as unilateral dislocations with shallow opposite hips.

5. Additional factors influencing the response to conservative treatment–sex, age at first attendance, family history, fragmentation of the femoral epiphysis and eccentric reduction–are discussed.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 40-B, Issue 4 | Pages 664 - 667
1 Nov 1958
Carter C Sweetnam R

The family we record draws attention to an association between recurrent dislocation of the patella and joint laxity, which is not confined to the knee. This may pass unrecognised if specific inquiry is not made. In this and other families reported, the joint laxity is inherited, as though due to a dominant gene, but some only of those affected suffer recurrent dislocation of the patella. It is probable that there are other genetically determined causes of recurrent patellar dislocation. In three other families we have seen more than one subject of patellar dislocation, but none had lax ligaments, and two other families have been recorded with no mention of associated joint laxity.