The results in 102 acetabuloplasties have been assessed in eighty-six patients, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Clinical and radiological assessment was carried out according to a score system very similar to that used in previous studies, and the results were expressed as excellent, good, fair and poor according to the score obtained. Any hip requiring further stabifising procedures was automatically grouped as a failure. Subtrochanteric femoral osteotomy was used when femoral anteversion was excessive. The results revealed that 73 per cent of the hips were satisfactory (excellent or good) overall, but that a steady deterioration was evident when the five-and fifteen-year groups were compared. Few of the hips were regarded as normal on radiological grounds. Homologous bone bank rib was found to be the most satisfactory graft material. Coxa magna was the most common abnormality that was consistent with a good or excellent result. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was found in only six hips; it was more commonly present in patients subjected to previous operation. Concentric reduction of the femoral head is essential if acetabuloplasty is to maintain stability of the hip.
1. The results of treatment of 134 patients with congenital dislocation of 167 hips are reviewed. 2. Late diagnosis is still a major problem. 3. Subluxations rarely give rise to poor results, but in dislocations first treated over the age of five years there is a one-in-three risk of failure. 4. Manipulative reduction is successful less often than reduction on a frame and carries a higher risk of avascular necrosis. 5. Closed reduction on a frame was satisfactory in 58 per cent of patients under the age of three years, and can succeed up to the age of five. 6. Open reduction was required in 20 per cent of cases under the age of three, and can be used successfully up to the age of six. 7. Seven anatomical barriers to closed reduction have been recognised and two or more are commonly found in one hip when open reduction is performed. 8. The acetabular roof may fail to develop after reduction, especially if this is delayed. A C.E. angle of under 20 degrees does not necessarily forebode this, unless measured on an arthrograph. Sclerosis of a sloping acetabular roof is an indication for operation. Acetabuloplasty is the proper operation for a sloping acetabulum and can be done successfully up to the age of twelve. Over this age, a shelf operation should be performed; this is appropriate also in younger patients in whom the curvature of the acetabulum is normal but does not extend far enough laterally. These operations were required in 38 per cent of hips treated in patients under the age of three, and in 64 per cent over this age. There is a one-in-three risk of avascular necrosis when acetabular reconstruction is done in patients under three. 9. Anteversion, if excessive, should be corrected by subtrochanteric osteotomy, and any valgus of the femoral neck should be corrected simultaneously. 10. Unilateral dislocations in patients over the age of six are best treated by Colonna's operation. In our few bilateral cases over this age our results have been disappointing. 11. Avascular necrosis is less common but more serious when it occurs over the age of three. Manipulative reduction and the use of frog-leg plasters are two avoidable factors which appear to increase its incidence. The more serious degrees are accompanied by stiffness of the hip, and when this sign is present weight bearing should be avoided. 12. Prolonged, though rarely permanent, limitation of movement occurs in some 10 per cent of cases. In a few, operative correction was required.
One hundred and sixty-four cases of intramedullary nailing of the long bones have been studied with special reference to the difficulties and complications encountered. There was one death not attributable to the method. Two cases of pulmonal fat embolism and one case of thrombosis occurred, all in fractures of the femur. The lessons we have learned from our mistakes can be summarised as follows: 1 . The method requires technical experience and knowledge and is not suited to inexperienced surgeons or surgeons with little fracture material at their disposal. 2. Intramedullary nailing should only be used in fractures to which the method is suited. In general, comminuted fractures or fractures near a joint are unsuitable. 3. Open reduction is preferable to closed methods. 4. The nail should never be driven in with violence. It should be removed and replaced with a new one if difficulty is encountered when inserting it. 5. In fractures of the femur the nail should be driven in from the tip of the trochanter after careful determination of the direction. 6. The nail should be introduced only to the level of the fracture before exploring and reducing the fracture. 7. Distraction of the fragments must be avoided. 8. If the nail bends it should be replaced by a new one, at least in femoral fractures. 9. If union is delayed, the fracture should be explored and chip grafts of cancellous bone placed around it. 10. Improvised nails or nails which are not made of absolutely reliable material should never be used. 11 . Make sure that the nail is equipped with an extraction hole for removal.
