General remarks–Comparison of the two reviews shows that patients with good results return more readily for a review than those with poor results. In middle-aged patients with some disability for walking an attendance of 80 per cent at least is necessary in order to obtain a representative follow-up five to ten years after operation.

An outstanding feature of all the operations reviewed is the degree of lasting relief of pain. It is rare to find that a patient with severe hip pain before operation has pain of the same severity after any of these operations at least up to ten years afterwards, and probably for much longer. Generally speaking, although in advancing years stiffness of the hip is undoubtedly a handicap, it is preferable to instability, particularly if this is progressive. A patient can adapt himself to and accept a disability that is permanent and unaltering, but instability increasing in later years can be distressing mentally and incapacitating physically.

Cup arthroplasty–There is an element of unpredictability in the results, especially the late results, of cup arthroplasty. Movement decreases and there is a tendency for pain and instability to increase after four or five years. There is little to indicate which case will be successful although the results vary according to the condition for which operation is performed. The operation gives good results, on the whole, for osteoarthritis, particularly when the operation is done on one hip only. Stability is much more important when both hips are involved, and, unless this is good in at least one hip, the results of bilateral operations are poor. "Excellent" results are not obtained in rheumatoid arthritis but few results are "poor." Operations for congenital dislocation of the hip give the most disappointing results. In operations for ankylosing spondylitis there is a high incidence of stiffening of the hip, but many patients are greatly improved in comparison to their state before operation.

Displacement osteotomy–The hazard in displacement osteotomy is ankylosis, particularly when internal fixation is not used. Relief of pain and stability are well maintained. The results in general, and for pain in particular, are less good when internal fixation is used. Adduction of the upper fragment of the femur appears to be of value in the production of a good result. In the series examined it was less often achieved when internal fixation was the method of immobilisation. The best results were obtained in cases of congenital dislocation of the hip and there were few "poor" results in cases of congenital subluxation.

Excision of the head and neck of the femur and Batchelor's operation–Rehabilitation may take a long time, but the late results are more predictable than in the other operations reviewed. A "fair" result is more likely than an "excellent" one, but late "poor" results are few. Relief of pain is better after excision of the head and neck than after any other operation reviewed.