The best method of treating unstable pelvic fractures that involve
the obturator ring is still a matter for debate. This study compared
three methods of treatment: nonoperative, isolated posterior fixation
and combined anteroposterior stabilization. The study used data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry and
compared patients undergoing conservative management (n = 2394),
surgical treatment (n = 1345) and transpubic surgery, including
posterior stabilization (n = 730) with isolated posterior osteosynthesis
(n = 405) in non-complex Type B and C fractures that only involved the
obturator ring anteriorly. Calculated odds ratios were adjusted
for potential confounders. Outcome criteria were intraoperative
and general short-term complications, the incidence of nerve injuries,
and mortality.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study investigated the quality and quantity of healing of a bone defect following intramedullary reaming undertaken by two fundamentally different systems; conventional, using non-irrigated, multiple passes; or suction/irrigation, using one pass. The result of a measured re-implantation of the product of reaming was examined in one additional group. We used 24 Swiss mountain sheep with a mean tibial medullary canal diameter between 8 mm and 9 mm. An 8 mm ‘napkin ring’ defect was created at the mid-diaphysis. The wound was either surgically closed or occluded. The medullary cavity was then reamed to 11 mm. The Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (RIA) System was used for the reaming procedure in groups A (RIA and autofilling) and B (RIA, collected reamings filled up), whereas reaming in group C (Synream and autofilling) was performed with the Synream System. The defect was allowed to auto-fill with reamings in groups A and C, but in group B, the defect was surgically filled with collected reamings. The tibia was then stabilised with a solid locking Unreamed Humerus Nail (UHN), 9.5 mm in diameter. The animals were killed after six weeks. After the implants were removed, measurements were taken to assess the stiffness, strength and callus formation at the site of the defect. There was no significant difference between healing after conventional reaming or suction/irrigation reaming. A significant improvement in the quality of the callus was demonstrated by surgically placing captured reamings into the defect using a graft harvesting system attached to the aspirator device. This was confirmed by biomechanical testing of stiffness and strength. This study suggests it could be beneficial to fill cortical defects with reaming particles in clinical practice, if feasible.
