The aim of this study was to compare the longer-term outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively managed patients treated with a removable brace (fixed-angle removable orthosis) or a plaster cast immobilization for an acute ankle fracture. This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing adults with an acute ankle fracture, initially managed either by operative or nonoperative care. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a cast immobilization or a fixed-angle removable orthosis (removable brace). Data were collected on baseline characteristics, ankle function, quality of life, and complications. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the primary outcome which was used to measure the participant’s ankle function. The primary endpoint was at 16 weeks, with longer-term follow-up at 24 weeks and two years.Aims
Methods
Rupture of the tendo Achillis is a common injury
with a rising incidence. Traditionally the key question following
this injury has been whether or not to operate. However a contemporary
Cochrane review highlighted that the method of rehabilitation may
also have an important contribution to the outcome. Since this review,
various early weight-bearing rehabilitation protocols have been
described. Currently evidence points to the use of early functional
rehabilitation, regardless of operative or non-operative management.
However, there is no consensus on which exact functional rehabilitation
protocol should be used. Future research should be directed towards
improving our understanding of how the different rehabilitative
components interact in the tendo Achillis as it heals.
