Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
Most surgeons favour removing forearm plates
in children. There is, however, no long-term data regarding the complications
of retaining a plate. We present a prospective case series of 82
paediatric patients who underwent plating of their forearm fracture
over an eight-year period with a minimum follow-up of two years.
The study institution does not routinely remove forearm plates.
A total of 116 plates were used: 79 one-third tubular plates and 37 dynamic
compression plates (DCP). There were 12 complications: six plates
(7.3%) were removed for pain or stiffness and there were six (7.3%)
implant-related fractures. Overall, survival of the plates was 85%
at 10 years. Cox regression analysis identified radial plates (odds
ratio (OR) 4.4, p = 0.03) and DCP fixation (OR 3.2, p = 0.02) to
be independent risk factors of an implant-related fracture. In contrast
ulnar plates were more likely to cause pain or irritation necessitating
removal (OR 5.6, p = 0.04). The complications associated with retaining a plate are different,
but do not occur more frequently than the complications following
removal of a plate in children.