Successful management of late presenting hip
dislocation in childhood is judged by the outcome not just at skeletal
maturity but well beyond into adulthood and late middle age. This
review considers different methods of treatment and looks critically
at the handful of studies reporting long-term follow-up after successful
reduction. Cite this article
The medial approach for the treatment of children
with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction
has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In
the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to
be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance
of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols,
primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis. Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the
medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach
(22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <
24 months at the
time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed
with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge
angle (CEA) were also measured. The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months
(3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24)
for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was
70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident
or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach
group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52).
The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to
10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There
was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between
the two groups. Children treated using an early medial approach did not have
a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up
than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates
of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols. Cite this article:
