Fresh-frozen allograft bone is frequently used
in orthopaedic surgery. We investigated the incidence of allograft-related
infection and analysed the outcomes of recipients of bacterial culture-positive
allografts from our single-institute bone bank during bone transplantation.
The fresh-frozen allografts were harvested in a strict sterile environment
during total joint arthroplasty surgery and immediately stored in
a freezer at -78º to -68º C after packing. Between January 2007
and December 2012, 2024 patients received 2083 allografts with a
minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The overall allograft-associated
infection rate was 1.2% (24/2024). Swab cultures of 2083 allografts
taken before implantation revealed 21 (1.0%) positive findings.
The 21 recipients were given various antibiotics at the individual
orthopaedic surgeon’s discretion. At the latest follow-up, none
of these 21 recipients displayed clinical signs of infection following
treatment. Based on these findings, we conclude that an incidental positive
culture finding for allografts does not correlate with subsequent
surgical site infection. Additional prolonged post-operative antibiotic
therapy may not be necessary for recipients of fresh-frozen bone
allograft with positive culture findings. Cite this article:
We investigated the antibiotic concentration in fresh-frozen femoral head allografts harvested from two groups of living donors. Ten samples were collected from patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and ten from those with a fracture of the neck of the femur scheduled for primary arthroplasty. Cefazolin (1 g) was administered as a pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic. After storage at −80°C for two weeks the pattern of release of cefazolin from morsellised femoral heads was evaluated by an We concluded that allografts of morsellised bone from the femoral head harvested from patients undergoing arthroplasty of the hip contained cefazolin, which had been administered pre-operatively and they exhibited inhibitory effects against bacteria
We evaluated 31 patients with bilateral dysplastic hips who had undergone periacetabular osteotomy for early (Tönnis grade 0 or 1) or moderate (Tönnis grade 2) osteoarthritis in one hip and total hip replacement for advanced (Tönnis grade 3) osteoarthritis in the other. At a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (2 to 9) after periacetabular osteotomy and 6.7 years (3 to 10) after total hip replacement, there was no difference in the functional outcome in hips undergoing osteotomy for early or moderate osteoarthritis and those with a total hip replacement, as determined by the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index. More patients preferred the spherical periacetabular osteotomy to total hip replacement (53% vs 23%; p = 0.029). Osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia is often progressive. Given the results, timely correction of dysplasia by periacetabular osteotomy should be considered whenever possible in young patients since this could produce a favourable outcome which is comparable with that of total hip replacement.
Multiple drilling is reported to be an effective treatment for osteonecrosis of the head of femur, but its effect on intra-osseous pressure has not been described. We undertook multiple drilling and recorded the intra-osseous pressure in 75 osteonecrotic hips in 60 patients with a mean age of 42 years (19 to 67). At a mean follow-up of 37.1 months (24 to 60), 42 hips (56%) had a clinically successful outcome. The procedure was effective in reducing the mean intra-osseous pressure from 57 mmHg (SD 22) to 16 mmHg (SD 9). Hips with a successful outcome had a mean pressure of 26 mmHg (SD 19). It was less effective in preventing progression of osteonecrosis in hips with considerable involvement and in those with a high intra-osseous pressure in the intertrochanteric region (mean 45 mmHg (SD 25)). This study is not able to answer whether a return of the intra-osseous pressure to normal levels is required for satisfactory healing.
We have carried out in 24 patients, a two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection with massive bone loss. We used a custom-made, antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis as an interim spacer. Fifteen patients had acetabular deficiencies, eight had segmental femoral bone loss and one had a combined defect. There was no recurrence of infection at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (2 to 7). A total of 21 patients remained mobile in the interim period. The mean Merle D’Aubigné and Postel hip score improved from 7.3 points before operation to 13.2 between stages and to 15.8 at the final follow-up. The allograft appeared to have incorporated into the host bone in all patients. Complications included two fractures and one dislocation of the cement prosthesis. The use of a temporary spacer maintains the function of the joint between stages even when there is extensive loss of bone. Allograft used in revision surgery after septic conditions restores bone stock without the risk of recurrent infection.
We retrospectively reviewed 45 hip arthroplasties which were performed over a period of 20 years in 38 patients with cirrhosis of the liver. There was a high perioperative 30-day complication rate (26.7%). Advanced cirrhosis was associated with a higher risk of complications (p = 0.004) as also was increased age, a high level of creatinine, a low level of albumin, a low platelet count, ascites, encephalopathy and an increased operative blood loss. The survival of the prosthesis at five years was 77.8% and infection was a major cause of failure. In view of the high rate of early complications and the limited longevity of the prosthesis, surgeons who perform hip arthroplasty on such patients should counsel them appropriately preoperatively.
