This retrospective study was designed to evaluate
the outcomes of re-dislocation of the radial head after corrective osteotomy
for chronic dislocation. A total of 12 children with a mean age
of 11 years (5 to 16), with further dislocation of the radial head
after corrective osteotomy of the forearm, were followed for a mean
of five years (2 to 10). Re-operations were performed for radial
head re-dislocation in six children, while the other six did not
undergo re-operation (‘non-re-operation group’). The active range
of movement (ROM) of their elbows was evaluated before and after
the first operation, and at the most recent follow-up. In the re-operation group, there were significant decreases in
extension, pronation, and supination when comparing the ROM following
the corrective osteotomy and following
re-operation (p <
0.05). The children who had not undergone re-operation achieved a better
ROM than those who had undergone re-operation. There was a significant difference in mean pronation (76° Cite this article:
Delayed diagnosis is a well-known complication of a Monteggia
fracture-dislocation. If left untreated, the dislocated radial head
later becomes symptomatic. The purposes of this study were firstly,
to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of open reduction
of the radial head and secondly, to identify the factors that may
affect the outcome of this procedure. This retrospective study evaluated 30 children with a chronic
Monteggia lesion. There were 18 boys and 12 girls with a mean age
of 7.4 years (4 to 13) at the time of open reduction. The mean interval
to surgery, after the initial fracture, was 23.4 months (6 to 120).
Clinical grading used a Kim modified elbow score: radiological outcome
was recorded. The effect of the patient’s age, gender, duration
from initial injury, Bado classification, and annular ligament reconstruction
were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 42.2 months (15 to 20).Aims
Materials and Methods
The type II Monteggia (posterior) lesion is a rare injury which is sometimes associated with ulnohumeral instability. We have reviewed 23 of 28 patients with this injury. A clinical and radiographic assessment was undertaken at follow-up. Functional outcome scores, including the Broberg and Morrey Index and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder or Hand (DASH), were used. The results from the six patients with associated posterior ulnohumeral dislocation were compared with 17 without ulnohumeral injury. Those with dislocation had reduced movement of the elbow and had outcome scores indicative of greater disability compared to those without associated dislocation.
