The aim of this trial was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a soft bandage and immediate discharge, compared with rigid immobilization, in children aged four to 15 years with a torus fracture of the distal radius. A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted from the UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, as well as a broader societal point of view. Health resources and quality of life (the youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y)) data were collected, as part of the Forearm Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) multicentre randomized controlled trial over a six-week period, using trial case report forms and patient-completed questionnaires. Costs and health gains (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) were estimated for the two trial treatment groups. Regression was used to estimate the probability of the new treatment being cost-effective at a range of ‘willingness-to-pay’ thresholds, which reflect a range of costs per QALY at which governments are typically prepared to reimburse for treatment.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to compare the mid-term outcomes
of patients with late-stage arthritis of the wrist treated with
proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and dorsal capsular interposition
(DCI) arthroplasty with a matched cohort treated with routine PRC
alone. A total of 25 arthritic wrists (24 patients) with pre-existing
degenerative changes of the proximal capitate and/or the lunate
fossa of the radius were treated with PRC + DCI over a ten-year
period. This group of patients were matched 1:2 with a group of
50 wrists (48 patients) without degenerative changes in the capitate
or lunate fossa that were treated with a routine PRC alone during
the same period. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery
was 56.8 years (25 to 81), and the demographics and baseline range
of movement of the wrist, grip strength, Quick Disabilities of the
Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and Patient-Rated Wrist
Evaluation (PRWE) score were similar in both groups. Aims
Patients and Methods
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
