Aims. The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. Methods. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of
We assessed the frequency and causes of neurological
deterioration in 59 patients with spinal cord injury on whom reports
were prepared for clinical negligence litigation. In those who deteriorated
neurologically we assessed the causes of the change in neurology
and whether that neurological deterioration was potentially preventable.
In all 27 patients (46%) changed neurologically, 20 patients (74%
of those who deteriorated) had no primary neurological deficit.
Of those who deteriorated, 13 (48%) became Frankel A. Neurological
deterioration occurred in 23 of 38 patients (61%) with unstable
fractures and/or dislocations; all 23 patients probably deteriorated
either because of failures to immobilise the spine or because of
inappropriate removal of spinal immobilisation. Of the 27 patients who
altered neurologically, neurological deterioration was, probably,
avoidable in 25 (excess movement in 23 patients with unstable injuries,
failure to evacuate an epidural haematoma in one patient and over-distraction following
manipulation of the cervical spine in one patient). If existing
guidelines and standards for the management of actual or potential
spinal cord injury had been followed, neurological deterioration
would have been prevented in 25 of the 27 patients (93%) who experienced
a deterioration in their neurological status. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was first, to determine
whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were
of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar
vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’. We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen
performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved
to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only
2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a
fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset
for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2
years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable
fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after
clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were
anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal
injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they
were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis
revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low
Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely
to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical
findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures
of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging
to reduce the risk of missed injury.
Instability may present at a different level after successful stabilisation of an unstable segment in apparently isolated injuries of the cervical spine. It can give rise to progressive deformity or symptoms which require further treatment. We performed one or more operations for
