Paediatric fractures are highly prevalent and are most often treated with plaster. The application and removal of plaster is often an anxiety-inducing experience for children. Decreasing the anxiety level may improve the patients’ satisfaction and the quality of healthcare. Virtual reality (VR) has proven to effectively distract children and reduce their anxiety in other clinical settings, and it seems to have a similar effect during plaster treatment. This study aims to further investigate the effect of VR on the anxiety level of children with fractures who undergo plaster removal or replacement in the plaster room. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 255 patients were included, aged five to 17 years, who needed plaster treatment for a fracture of the upper or lower limb. Randomization was stratified for age (five to 11 and 12 to 17 years). The intervention group was distracted with VR goggles and headphones during the plaster treatment, whereas the control group received standard care. As the primary outcome, the post-procedural level of anxiety was measured with the Child Fear Scale (CFS). Secondary outcomes included the children’s anxiety reduction (difference between CFS after and CFS before plaster procedure), numerical rating scale (NRS) pain, NRS satisfaction of the children and accompanying parents/guardians, and the children’s heart rates during the procedure. An independent-samples Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) complicates
between 0.5% and 1.2% primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and
may have devastating consequences. The traditional assessment of
patients suffering from PJI has involved the serological study of
inflammatory markers and microbiological analysis of samples obtained
from the joint space. Treatment has involved debridement and revision
arthroplasty performed in either one or two stages. We present an update on the burden of PJI, strategies for its
diagnosis and treatment, the challenge of resistant organisms and
the need for definitive evidence to guide the treatment of PJI after
THA. Cite this article:
We present the results of 62 consecutive acetabular
revisions using impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene
acetabular component in 58 patients (13 men and 45 women) after
a mean follow-up of 27 years (25 to 30). All patients were prospectively
followed. The mean age at revision was 59.2 years (23 to 82). We performed Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis and also a Competing
Risk (CR) analysis because with long-term follow-up, the presence
of a competing event (i.e. death) prevents the occurrence of the
endpoint of re-revision. A total of 48 patients (52 hips) had died or had been re-revised
at final review in March 2011. None of the deaths were related to
the surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the ten surviving hips
in ten patients was 76 points (45 to 99). The KM survivorship at 25 years for the endpoint ‘re-revision
for any reason’ was 58.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 73)
and for ‘re-revision for aseptic loosening’ 72.1% (95% CI 51 to
85). With the CR analysis we calculated the KM analysis overestimates
the failure rate with respectively 74% and 93% for these endpoints.
The current study shows that acetabular impaction bone grafting
revisions provide good clinical results at over 25 years. Cite this article:
We report the clinical and radiographic outcomes
of 208 consecutive femoral revision arthroplasties performed in 202
patients (119 women, 83 men) between March 1991 and December 2007
using the X-change Femoral Revision System, fresh-frozen morcellised
allograft and a cemented polished Exeter stem. All patients were
followed prospectively. The mean age of the patients at revision
was 65 years (30 to 86). At final review in December 2013 a total
of 130 patients with 135 reconstructions (64.9%) were alive and
had a non re-revised femoral component after a mean follow-up of
10.6 years (4.7 to 20.9). One patient was lost to follow-up at six
years, and their data were included up to this point.
Re-operation for any reason was performed in 33 hips (15.9%), in
13 of which the femoral component was re-revised (6.3%). The mean
pre-operative Harris hip score was 52 (19 to 95) (n = 73) and improved
to 80 (22 to 100) (n = 161) by the last follow-up. Kaplan–Meier
survival with femoral re-revision for any reason as the endpoint
was 94.9% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 90.2 to 97.4) at ten years;
with femoral re-revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint it was
99.4% (95% CI 95.7 to 99.9); with femoral re-operation for any reason
as the endpoint it was 84.5% (95% CI 78.3 to 89.1); and with subsidence ≥ 5
mm it was 87.3% (95% CI 80.5 to 91.8). Femoral revision with the
use of impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished
stem results in a satisfying survival rate at a mean of ten years’ follow-up. Cite this article:
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating
complication which can follow a total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
Although rare, this ongoing threat undermines the success of TJA,
a historically reputable procedure. It has haunted the orthopedic
community for decades and several ongoing studies have provided
insights and new approaches to effectively battle this multilayered
problem.
PCL retaining fixed-bearing TKA is a highly successful
operation with the need for more surgery occurring at the rate of
approximately 0.4% per year over the first 27 years. The most common
cause for revision surgery is related to polyethylene insert failure
and accounts for approximately 50% of re-operations. Late metastatic
infection is the next most frequent cause followed by patellar problems,
late instability and component loosening in decreasing frequency.
A myriad of rare miscellaneous problems can also occur.
The routine administration of prophylactic antibiotics for dental interventions to prevent haematogenous spread of infections to prosthetic joints is a contentious issue. In this editorial we discuss the potentially harmful effects of this practice and propose an alternative solution.
More than a million hip replacements are carried out each year worldwide, and the number of other artificial joints inserted is also rising, so that infections associated with arthroplasties have become more common. However, there is a paucity of literature on infections due to haematogenous seeding following
