The objective of this study was to investigate bone healing after
internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) with
the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP) in a young patient population
treated by various orthopaedic (trauma) surgeons. We present a multicentre prospective case series with a follow-up
of one year. All patients aged ≤ 60 years with a displaced FNF treated
with the DLBP between 1st August 2010 and December 2014 were included.
Patients with pathological fractures, concomitant fractures of the
lower limb, symptomatic arthritis, local infection or inflammation,
inadequate local tissue coverage, or any mental or neuromuscular
disorder were excluded. Primary outcome measure was failure in fracture
healing due to nonunion, avascular necrosis, or implant failure
requiring revision surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
The spiral blade modification of the Dynamic
Hip Screw (DHS) was designed for superior biomechanical fixation
in the osteoporotic femoral head. Our objective was to compare clinical
outcomes and in particular the incidence of loss of fixation. In a series of 197 consecutive patients over the age of 50 years
treated with DHS-blades (blades) and 242 patients treated with conventional
DHS (screw) for AO/OTA 31.A1 or A2 intertrochanteric fractures were
identified from a prospectively compiled database in a level 1 trauma
centre. Using propensity score matching, two groups comprising 177
matched patients were compiled and radiological and clinical outcomes
compared. In each group there were 66 males and 111 females. Mean
age was 83.6 (54 to 100) for the conventional DHS group and 83.8
(52 to 101) for the blade group. Loss of fixation occurred in two blades and 13 DHSs. None of
the blades had observable migration while nine DHSs had gross migration
within the femoral head before the fracture healed. There were two
versus four implant cut-outs respectively and one side plate pull-out
in the DHS group. There was no significant difference in mortality
and eventual walking ability between the groups. Multiple logistic
regression suggested that poor reduction (odds ratio (OR) 11.49,
95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.45 to 90.9, p = 0.021) and fixation
by DHS (OR 15.85, 95%CI 2.50 to 100.3, p = 0.003) were independent
predictors of loss of fixation. The spiral blade design may decrease the risk of implant migration
in the femoral head but does not reduce the incidence of cut-out
and reoperation. Reduction of the fracture is of paramount importance
since poor reduction was an independent predictor for loss of fixation
regardless of the implant being used. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to quantify the stability
of fracture-implant complex in fractures after fixation. A total
of 15 patients with an undisplaced fracture of the femoral neck,
treated with either a dynamic hip screw or three cannulated hip
screws, and 16 patients with an AO31-A2 trochanteric fracture treated
with a dynamic hip screw or a Gamma Nail, were included. Radiostereometric
analysis was used at six weeks, four months and 12 months post-operatively
to evaluate shortening and rotation. Migration could be assessed in ten patients with a fracture of
the femoral neck and seven with a trochanteric fracture. By four
months post-operatively, a mean shortening of 5.4 mm (-0.04 to 16.1)
had occurred in the fracture of the femoral neck group and 5.0 mm
(-0.13 to 12.9) in the trochanteric fracture group. A wide range
of rotation occurred in both types of fracture. Right-sided trochanteric
fractures seem more rotationally stable than left-sided fractures. This prospective study shows that migration at the fracture site
occurs continuously during the first four post-operative months,
after which stabilisation occurs. This information may allow the
early recognition of patients at risk of failure of fixation. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to identify factors
that predict implant cut-out after cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric
and subtrochanteric hip fractures, and to test the significance
of calcar referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD) as a predictor for
cut-out. We retrospectively reviewed 170 consecutive fractures that had
undergone cephalomedullary nailing. Of these, 77 met the inclusion
criteria of a non-pathological fracture with a minimum of 80 days
radiological follow-up (mean 408 days; 81 days to 4.9 years). The
overall cut-out rate was 13% (10/77). The significant parameters in the univariate analysis were tip-apex
distance (TAD) (p <
0.001), CalTAD (p = 0.001), cervical angle
difference (p = 0.004), and lag screw placement in the anteroposterior
(AP) view (Parker’s ratio index) (p = 0.003). Non-significant parameters
were age (p = 0.325), gender (p = 1.000), fracture side (p = 0.507),
fracture type (AO classification) (p = 0.381), Singh Osteoporosis
Index (p = 0.575), lag screw placement in the lateral view (p =
0.123), and reduction quality (modified Baumgaertner’s method) (p = 0.575).
In the multivariate analysis, CalTAD was the only significant measurement
(p = 0.001). CalTAD had almost perfect inter-observer reliability
(interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.901). Our data provide the first reported clinical evidence that CalTAD
is a predictor of cut-out. The finding of CalTAD as the only significant
parameter in the multivariate analysis, along with the univariate
significance of Parker’s ratio index in the AP view, suggest that
inferior placement of the lag screw is preferable to reduce the
rate of cut-out. Cite this article:
Although the importance of lateral femoral wall
integrity is increasingly being recognised in the treatment of intertrochanteric
fracture, little attention has been put on the development of a
secondary post-operative fracture of the lateral wall. Patients
with post-operative fractures of the lateral wall were reported
to have high rates of re-operation and complication. To date, no
predictors of post-operative lateral wall fracture have been reported.
In this study, we investigated the reliability of lateral wall thickness
as a predictor of lateral wall fracture after dynamic hip screw
(DHS) implantation. A total of 208 patients with AO/OTA 31-A1 and -A2 classified
intertrochanteric fractures who received internal fixation with
a DHS between January 2003 and May 2012 were reviewed. There were
103 men and 150 women with a mean age at operation of
78 years (33 to 94). The mean follow-up was 23 months (6 to 83).
The right side was affected in 97 patients and the left side in
111. Clinical information including age, gender, side, fracture
classification, tip–apex distance, follow-up time, lateral wall
thickness and outcome were recorded and used in the statistical
analysis. Fracture classification and lateral wall thickness significantly
contributed to post-operative lateral wall fracture (both p <
0.001). The lateral wall thickness threshold value for risk of developing
a secondary lateral wall fracture was found to be 20.5 mm. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the
risk factors of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric
fracture. We found that lateral wall thickness was a reliable predictor
of post-operative lateral wall fracture and conclude that intertrochanteric
fractures with a lateral wall thickness <
20.5 mm should not
be treated with DHS alone. Cite this article:
The Gamma nail is frequently used in unstable
peri-trochanteric hip fractures. We hypothesised that mechanical failure
of the Gamma nail was associated with inadequate proximal three-point
fixation. We identified a consecutive series of 299 Gamma nails
implanted in 299 patients over a five-year period, 223 of whom fulfilled
our inclusion criteria for investigation. The series included 61
men and 162 women with a mean age of 81 years (20 to 101). Their fractures
were classified according to the Modified Evans’ classification
and the quality of fracture reduction was graded. The technical
adequacy of three points of proximal fixation was recorded from
intra-operative fluoroscopic images, and technical inadequacy for
each point was defined. All patients were followed to final follow-up
and mechanical failures were identified. A multivariate statistical
analysis was performed, adjusting for confounders. A total of 16
failures (7.2%) were identified. The position of the lag screw relative
to the lateral cortex was the most important point of proximal fixation,
and when inadequate the failure rate was 25.8% (eight of 31: odds
ratio 7.5 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 22.7), p <
0.001). Mechanical failure of the Gamma nail in peri-trochanteric femoral
fractures is rare (<
1%) when three-point proximal fixation is
achieved. However, when proximal fixation is inadequate, failure
rates increase. The strongest predictor of failure is positioning
the lateral end of the lag screw short of the lateral cortex. Adherence
to simple technical points minimises the risk of fixation failure
in this vulnerable patient group. Cite this article:
We undertook a multicentre, prospective study of a series of 112 unstable trochanteric fractures in order to evaluate if internal fixation with a sliding screw device combined with augmentation using a calcium phosphate degradable cement (Norian SRS) could improve the clinical, functional and radiological outcome when compared with fractures treated with a sliding screw device alone. Pain, activities of daily living, health status (SF-36), the strength of the hip abductor muscles and radiological outcome were analysed. Six weeks after surgery, the patients in the augmented group had significantly lower global and functional pain scores (p <
0.003), less pain after walking 50 feet (p <
0.01), and a better return to the activities of daily living (p <
0.05). At follow-up at six weeks and six months, those in the augmented group showed a significant improvement compared with the control group in the SF-36 score. No other significant differences were found between the groups. We conclude that augmentation with calcium phosphate cement in unstable trochanteric fractures provides a modest reduction in pain and a slight improvement in the quality of life during the course of healing when compared with conventional fixation with a sliding screw device alone.
We compared the results of the surgical treatment of trochanteric hip fractures before and after surgeons had been introduced to the tip-apex distance (TAD) as a method of evaluating screw position. There were 198 fractures evaluated retrospectively and 118 after instruction. The