The primary aim of this paper was to outline the processes involved in building the Partners Arthroplasty Registry (PAR), established in April 2016 to capture baseline and outcome data for patients undergoing arthroplasty in a regional healthcare system. A secondary aim was to determine the quality of PAR’s data. A tertiary aim was to report preliminary findings from the registry and contributions to quality improvement initiatives and research up to March 2019. Structured Query Language was used to obtain data relating to patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) from the hospital network’s electronic medical record (EMR) system to be included in the PAR. Data were stored in a secure database and visualized in dashboards. Quality assurance of PAR data was performed by review of the medical records. Capture rate was determined by comparing two months of PAR data with operating room schedules. Linear and binary logistic regression models were constructed to determine if length of stay (LOS), discharge to a care home, and readmission rates improved between 2016 and 2019.Aims
Methods
There is not adequate evidence to establish whether external
fixation (EF) of pelvic fractures leads to a reduced mortality.
We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank database to identify isolated
unstable pelvic ring fractures to exclude the possibility of blood
loss from other injuries, and analyzed the effectiveness of EF on
mortality in this group of patients. This was a registry-based comparison of 1163 patients who had
been treated for an isolated unstable pelvic ring fracture with
(386 patients) or without (777 patients) EF. An isolated pelvic
ring fracture was defined by an Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) for
other injuries of <
3. An unstable pelvic ring fracture was defined
as having an AIS ≥ 4. The primary outcome of this study was mortality.
A subgroup analysis was carried out for patients who required blood
transfusion within 24 hours of arrival in the Emergency Department
and those who had massive blood loss (AIS code: 852610.5). Propensity-score
matching was used to identify a cohort like the EF and non-EF groups.Aim
Patients and Methods
We describe the impact of a targeted performance
improvement programme and the associated performance improvement
interventions, on mortality rates, error rates and process of care
for haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Clinical
care and
