The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative bisphosphonate treatment on the intra- and postoperative outcomes of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The hypothesis was that previous bisphosphonate treatment would adversely affect both intra- and postoperative outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing arthroplasty of the shoulder, at a single institution. Two patients with no previous bisphosphonate treatment were matched to each patient who had received this treatment preoperatively by gender, age, race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and type of arthroplasty. Previous bisphosphonate treatment was defined as treatment occurring during the three-year period before the arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of intraoperative complications and those occurring at one and two years postoperatively. A total of 87 patients were included: 29 in the bisphosphonates-exposed (BP+) group and 58 in the non-exposed (BP-) group. In the BP+ group, there were 26 female and three male patients, with a mean age of 71.4 years (51 to 87). In the BP- group, there were 52 female and six male patients, with a mean age of 72.1 years (53 to 88).Aims
Patients and Methods
Neuropathic changes in the foot are common with
a prevalence of approximately 1%. The diagnosis of neuropathic arthropathy
is often delayed in diabetic patients with harmful consequences
including amputation. The appropriate diagnosis and treatment can
avoid an extensive programme of treatment with significant morbidity
for the patient, high costs and delayed surgery. The pathogenesis
of a Charcot foot involves repetitive micro-trauma in a foot with impaired
sensation and neurovascular changes caused by pathological innervation
of the blood vessels. In most cases, changes are due to a combination
of both pathophysiological factors. The Charcot foot is triggered
by a combination of mechanical, vascular and biological factors
which can lead to late diagnosis and incorrect treatment and eventually
to destruction of the foot. This review aims to raise awareness of the diagnosis of the Charcot
foot (diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy and the differential
diagnosis, erysipelas, peripheral arterial occlusive disease) and
describe the ways in which the diagnosis may be made. The clinical
diagnostic pathways based on different classifications are presented. Cite this article:
Giant cell tumours (GCT) of the synovium and
tendon sheath can be classified into two forms: localised (giant
cell tumour of the tendon sheath, or nodular tenosynovitis) and
diffuse (diffuse-type giant cell tumour or pigmented villonodular
synovitis). The former principally affects the small joints. It
presents as a solitary slow-growing tumour with a characteristic
appearance on MRI and is treated by surgical excision. There is
a significant risk of multiple recurrences with aggressive diffuse
disease. A multidisciplinary approach with dedicated MRI, histological assessment
and planned surgery with either adjuvant radiotherapy or systemic
targeted therapy is required to improve outcomes in recurrent and
refractory diffuse-type GCT. Although arthroscopic synovectomy through several portals has
been advocated as an alternative to arthrotomy, there is a significant
risk of inadequate excision and recurrence, particularly in the
posterior compartment of the knee. For local disease partial arthroscopic
synovectomy may be sufficient, at the risk of recurrence. For both
local and diffuse intra-articular disease open surgery is advised
for recurrent disease. Marginal excision with focal disease will
suffice, not dissimilar to the treatment of GCT of tendon sheath.
For recurrent and extra-articular soft-tissue disease adjuvant therapy,
including intra-articular radioactive colloid or moderate-dose external
beam radiotherapy, should be considered.
