Aims. We investigated the efficacy and safety profile of commonly used venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis agents following hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and OrthoSearch was performed. Prophylaxis agents investigated were aspirin (< 325 mg and ≥ 325 mg daily), enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, unfractionated heparin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran. The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the risk of VTE, whereas the primary safety outcomes of interest were the risk of major bleeding events (MBE) and wound complications (WC). VTE was defined as the confirmed diagnosis of any deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.
Aims. Intra-articular (IA) injection may be used when treating hip osteoarthritis (OA). Common injections include steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), local anaesthetic, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is proven to reduce blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but there are limited data on the impact of similar dosing regimens in revision TKA. The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to determine the optimal regimen to maximize the blood-sparing properties of TXA in revision TKA. From six-centres, 233 revision TKAs were randomized to one of four regimens: 1 g of intravenous (IV) TXA given prior to the skin incision, a double-dose regimen of 1 g IV TXA given both prior to skin incision and at time of wound closure, a combination of 1 g IV TXA given prior to skin incision and 1 g of intraoperative topical TXA, or three doses of 1950 mg oral TXA given two hours preoperatively, six hours postoperatively, and on the morning of postoperative day one. Randomization was performed based on the type of revision procedure to ensure equivalent distribution among groups. Power analysis determined that 40 patients per group were necessary to identify a 1 g/dl difference in the reduction of haemoglobin postoperatively between groups with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.80. Per-protocol analysis involved regression analysis and two one-sided Aims
Patients and Methods
Dupuytren’s contracture is a benign, myoproliferative condition
affecting the palmar fascia that results in progressive contractures
of the fingers. Despite increased knowledge of the cellular and
connective tissue changes involved, neither a cure nor an optimum
form of treatment exists. The aim of this systematic review was
to summarize the best available evidence on the management of this
condition. A comprehensive database search for randomized controlled trials
(RCTs) was performed until August 2017. We studied RCTs comparing
open fasciectomy with percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA), collagenase
clostridium histolyticum (CCH) with placebo, and CCH with PNA, in
addition to adjuvant treatments aiming to improve the outcome of
open fasciectomy. A total of 20 studies, involving 1584 patients,
were included.Aims
Materials and Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication
of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials
have different surface properties and it has been suggested that
the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after
THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate
of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene
(CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings. Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web
of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies
that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces.
Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated
risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed
using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance
with methods of the Cochrane group.Aims
Patients and Methods
We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage
and death after total hip replacement in patients receiving either
aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). We analysed data from
the National Joint Registry for England and Wales linked to an administrative
database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service.
A total of 108 584 patients operated on between April 2003 and September 2008
were included and followed up for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling
and propensity score matching were used to estimate odds ratios
(OR) adjusted for baseline risk factors. An OR <
1 indicates
that rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. In all, 21.1%
of patients were prescribed aspirin and 78.9% LMWH. Without adjustment, we
found no statistically significant differences. The rate of pulmonary
embolism was 0.68% in both groups and 90-day mortality was 0.65%
with aspirin and 0.61% with LMWH (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11).
With risk adjustment, the difference in mortality increased (OR
0.84; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01). With propensity score matching the mortality difference
increased even further to 0.65% with aspirin and 0.51% with LMWH
(OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). These results should be considered
when the conflicting recommendations of existing guidelines for
thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement are being addressed.
Following the publication in 2007 of the guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) for patients undergoing surgery, concerns were raised by British orthopaedic surgeons as to the appropriateness of the recommendations for their clinical practice. In order to address these concerns NICE and the British Orthopaedic Association agreed to engage a representative panel of orthopaedic surgeons in the process of developing expanded VTE guidelines applicable to all patients admitted to hospital. The functions of this panel were to review the evidence and to consider the applicability and implications in orthopaedic practice in order to advise the main Guideline Development Group in framing recommendations. The panel considered both direct and indirect evidence of the safety and efficacy, the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis and its implication in clinical practice for orthopaedic patients. We describe the process of selection of the orthopaedic panel, the evidence considered and the contribution of the panel to the latest guidelines from NICE on the prophylaxis against VTE, published in January 2010.
