The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients
with outlier varus or valgus alignment in kinematically aligned
total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether those with outlier varus
or valgus alignment have higher forces in the medial or lateral
compartments of the knee than those with in-range alignment and
whether measurements of the alignment of the limb, knee and components
predict compartment forces. The intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments
were measured with an instrumented tibial insert in 67 patients
who underwent a kinematically aligned TKA during passive movement.
The mean of the forces at full extension, 45° and 90° of flexion
determined the force in the medial and lateral compartments. Measurements
of the alignment of the limb and the components included the hip-knee-ankle
(HKA) angle, proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA), and distal lateral
femoral angle (DLFA). Measurements of the alignment of the knee
and the components included the tibiofemoral angle (TFA), tibial
component angle (TCA) and femoral component angle (FCA). Alignment was
measured on post-operative, non-weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP)
scanograms and categorised as varus or valgus outlier or in-range
in relation to mechanically aligned criteria.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative radiographic
and clinical outcomes between kinematically and mechanically aligned
total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). A total of 60 TKAs (30 kinematically and 30 mechanically aligned)
were performed in 60 patients with varus osteoarthritis of the knee
using a navigation system. The angles of orientation of the joint
line in relation to the floor, the conventional and true mechanical
axis (tMA) (the line from the centre of the hip to the lowest point
of the calcaneus) were compared, one year post-operatively, on single-leg
and double-leg standing long leg radiographs between the groups.
The range of movement and 2011 Knee Society Scores were also compared
between the groups at that time.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods. We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial
to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in
mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA).
A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either
kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative
hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis
outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36,
Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed
up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks,
three and six months and one year post-operatively. Results. A total of 78% of the kinematically aligned group (28 patients)
and 77% of the mechanically aligned group (27 patients) were within
3° of their pre-operative plan. There were no statistically significant
differences in the mean KOOS (difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval
(CI) -9.4 to 12.1, p = 0.80), EQ-5D (difference 0.8, 95% CI -7.9
to 9.6, p = 0.84), ROM (difference 0.1, 95% CI -6.0 to 6.1, p =
0.99), two minute distance tolerance (difference 20.0, 95% CI -52.8 to
92.8, p = 0.58), or timed up and go (difference 0.78, 95% CI -2.3
to 3.9, p = 0.62) between the groups at one year. Conclusion.
We have previously reported the short-term radiological
results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically
aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR,
along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report
the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients
(88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically
aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned
TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat
basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the
method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically
aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15
to 48) In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed
with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored
better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment
technique performed with conventional instruments. Cite this article:
