Aims. The primary aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that fracture morphology might be more important than posterior malleolar fragment size in rotational type posterior malleolar ankle fractures (PMAFs). The secondary aim was to identify clinically important predictors of outcome for each respective PMAF-type, to challenge the current dogma that surgical decision-making should be based on fragment size. Methods. This observational prospective cohort study included 70 patients with operatively treated rotational type PMAFs, respectively: 23 Haraguchi Type I (large posterolateral-oblique), 22 Type II (two-part posterolateral and posteromedial), and 25 (avulsion-) Type III. There was no standardized protocol on how to address the PMAFs and CT-imaging was used to classify fracture morphology and quality of postoperative syndesmotic reduction. Quantitative 3D-CT (Q3DCT) was used to assess the quality of fracture reduction, respectively: the proportion of articular involvement; residual intra-articular: gap, step-off, and 3D-displacement; and residual gap and step-off at the fibular notch. These predictors were correlated with the
The medial malleolus, once believed to be the primary stabilizer of the ankle, has been the topic of conflicting clinical and biomechanical data for many decades. Despite the relevant surgical anatomy being understood for almost 40 years, the optimal treatment of medial malleolar fractures remains unclear, whether the injury occurs in isolation or as part of an unstable bi- or trimalleolar fracture configuration. Traditional teaching recommends open reduction and fixation of medial malleolar fractures that are part of an unstable injury. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that nonoperative management of well-reduced fractures may result in equivalent outcomes, but without the morbidity associated with surgery. This review gives an update on the relevant anatomy and classification systems for medial malleolar fractures and an overview of the current literature regarding their management, including surgical approaches and the choice of implants. Cite this article: Abstract
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the intermediate-term
outcomes after revision anatomical ankle ligament reconstruction
augmented with suture tape for a failed modified Broström procedure. A total of 30 patients with persistent instability of the ankle
after a Broström procedure underwent revision augmented with suture
tape. Of these, 24 patients who were followed up for more than two
years were included in the study. There were 13 men and 11 women.
Their mean age was 31.8 years (23 to 44). The mean follow-up was 38.5
months (24 to 56) The clinical outcome was assessed using the Foot
and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
(FAAM) score. The stability of the ankle was assessed using stress
radiographs.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. The aim of this study was to report the outcome following primary
fixation or a staged protocol for type C fractures of the tibial
plafond. Patients and Methods. We studied all patients who sustained a complex intra-articular
fracture (AO type C) of the distal tibia over an 11-year period.
The primary short-term outcome was infection. The primary long-term
outcome was the
The
It has previously been suggested that among unstable
ankle fractures, the presence of a malleolar fracture is associated
with a worse outcome than a corresponding ligamentous injury. However,
previous studies have included heterogeneous groups of injury. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether any specific pattern of
bony and/or ligamentous injury among a series of supination-external
rotation type IV (SER IV) ankle fractures treated with anatomical
fixation was associated with a worse outcome. We analysed a prospective cohort of 108 SER IV ankle fractures
with a follow-up of one year. Pre-operative radiographs and MRIs
were undertaken to characterise precisely the pattern of injury.
Operative treatment included fixation of all malleolar fractures.
Post-operative CT was used to assess reduction. The primary and
secondary outcome measures were the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score
(FAOS) and the range of movement of the ankle. There were no clinically relevant differences between the four
possible SER IV fracture pattern groups with regard to the FAOS
or range of movement. In this population of strictly defined SER
IV ankle injuries, the presence of a malleolar fracture was not
associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome than its
ligamentous injury counterpart. Other factors inherent to the injury
and treatment may play a more important role in predicting outcome.