Aims

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Aims

Massive endoprostheses rely on extra-cortical bone bridging (ECBB) to enhance fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of selective laser sintered (SLS) porous collars in augmenting the osseointegration of these prostheses.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost effective and extremely successful operation. As longevity increases, the demand for primary TKA will continue to rise. The success and survivorship of TKAs are dependent on the demographics of the patient, surgical technique and implant-related factors.

Currently the risk of failure of a TKA requiring revision surgery ten years post-operatively is 5%.

The most common indications for revision include aseptic loosening (29.8%), infection (14.8%), and pain (9.5%). Revision surgery poses considerable clinical burdens on patients and financial burdens on healthcare systems.

We present a current concepts review on the epidemiology of failed TKAs using data from worldwide National Joint Registries.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):105–12.

The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the mid-term outcomes following revision total knee replacement (TKR) in 76 patients (81 knees) < 55 years of age with those of a matched group of primary TKRs based on age, BMI, gender and comorbid conditions. We report the activity levels, functional scores, rates of revision and complications. Compared with patients undergoing primary TKR, those undergoing revision TKR had less improvement in the mean Knee Society function scores (8.14 (–55 to +60) vs 23.3 points (–40 to +80), p < 0.001), a similar improvement in UCLA activity level (p = 0.52), and similar minor complication rates (16% vs 13%, p = 0.83) at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (2 to 13.4). Further revision surgery was more common among revised TKRs (17% vs 5%, p = 0.02), with deep infection and instability being the most common reasons for failure. As many as one-third of patients aged < 55 years in the revision group had a complication or failure requiring further surgery.

Young patients undergoing revision TKR should be counselled that they can expect somewhat less improvement and a higher risk of complications than occur after primary TKR.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1657–62

As part of the government’s initiative to reduce waiting times for major joint surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust sent 224 patients (258 knees) to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement. The Kinemax total knee replacement system was used in all cases. The cumulative survival rate at three years was 79.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69.2 to 86.8) using re-operation for any cause as an endpoint and 85.3% (95% CI 75.9 to 91.8) using aseptic revision as an endpoint. This is significantly worse than that recorded in the published literature. These poor results have resulted in a significant impact on our service.

We carried out a prospective study to assess the clinical outcome, complications and survival of the NexGen Legacy posterior-stabilised-Flex total knee replacement (TKR) in a consecutive series of 278 knees between May 2003 and February 2005. Mean follow-up for 259 TKRs (98.2%) was 3.8 years (3.0 to 4.8). Annual follow-up showed improvement in the Knee Society scores (paired t-test, p < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the mean maximum flexion was 135° (110° to 150°). Two knees showed radiolucent lines, but revision was not required because the patients were asymptomatic. Revision was required in one case because of infection, but there were no prosthesis-related revisions. There were no other complications. The estimated survival rate at four years with revision for any reason and prosthesis-related problems was 99.6% and 100%, respectively.

This relatively large study indicates that the legacy posterior stabilised-Flex design provides excellent short-term outcome but warrants ongoing evaluation to confirm the long-term durability and functioning of the implant.

Aseptic loosening is a major cause of failure of total hip arthroplasty. The adverse tissue response to prosthetic wear particles, with activation of cytokine and prostanoid production, contributes to bone loss around the implants. We have investigated the possibility that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) are expressed in macrophages in the pseudomembrane at the bone-implant interface, thereby contributing to the periprosthetic bone resorption.

We also assessed whether peroxynitrite, a nitric oxide (NO)-derived oxidant associated with cellular injury, is generated in the membrane. Enzymatic activity of iNOS was measured using the arginine-citrulline assay technique and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), as an indicator of COX-2 activity, was measured using an enzyme immunoassay.

Cellular immunoreactivity for iNOS, nitrotyrosine (a marker of peroxynitrite-induced cellular injury) and COX-2 was assessed by quantitative peroxidase immunocytochemistry while immunofluorescence methods were used for subsequent co-localisation studies with CD68⁺ macrophages.

The presence of calcium-independent iNOS activity and PGE₂ production was confirmed in the homogenized interface membrane. Immunocytochemistry showed that periprosthetic CD68⁺ wear-debris-laden macrophages were the most prominent cell type immunoreactive for iNOS, nitrotyrosine and COX-2. Other periprosthetic inflammatory and resident cell types were also found to immunolocalise nitrotyrosine thereby suggesting peroxynitrite-induced protein nitrosylation and cellular damage not only in NO-producing CD68⁺ macrophages, but also in their neighbouring cells. These data indicate that both iNOS and COX-2 are expressed by CD68⁺ macrophages in the interface membrane and peroxynitrite-induced cellular damage is evident in such tissue. If high-output NO and peroxynitrite generation were to cause macrophage cell death, this would result in the release of phagocytosed wear debris into the extracellular matrix. A detrimental cycle of events would then be established with further phagocytosis by newly-recruited inflammatory cells and subsequent NO, peroxynitrite and prostanoid synthesis. Since both NO and have been implicated in the induction and PGE₂ maintenance of chronic inflammation with resulting loss of bone, and peroxynitrite in the pathogenesis of disease states, they may be central to the pathogenesis of aseptic loosening.

Aseptic loosening is seen in a significant proportion of cemented total hip replacements (THR). In a small subgroup of patients who suffer early loosening polyethylene debris is unlikely to be responsible. We recently reported one case of allergic contact dermatitis to N,N-dimethylparatoluidine (DMT), an accelerator used in bone cement. We have therefore investigated this using skin-patch tests to a variety of substances including metals, polyethylene and the separated individual components of Simplex cement.

We studied 70 patients, 15 with aseptic loosening less than two years after THR, 25 with satisfactory long-term cemented fixation, five with infected loosening of cemented THRs and 25 awaiting hip arthroplasty. We found seven positive reactions to DMT, all of them in patients with the rapid onset of aseptic loosening.

Allergy to DMT is recognised in the dental profession in respect of the ‘denture sore mouth’ syndrome, and could also be an occupational hazard since some industrial glues contain DMT. Our results suggest the need for awareness of possible previous dental or occupational exposure to the constituents of bone cement. We recommend the use of skin-patch testing in high-risk cases.

We have made a retrospective study of 1001 custom-made prostheses used as replacements after surgery for bone tumours. There were 493 distal femoral, 263 proximal femoral and 245 proximal tibial prostheses. Aseptic loosening was shown to be the principal mode of failure of the implants, and 71 patients had revision for aseptic loosening of a cemented intramedullary stem.

The probability of a patient surviving aseptic loosening for 120 months was 93.8% for a proximal femoral replacement, 67.4% for a distal femoral prosthesis and 58% for a proximal tibial implant. In patients with distal femoral replacements the age of the patient at the time of operation and the percentage of bone resected were related to the risk of aseptic loosening. Young patients with distal femoral prostheses in whom a high percentage of the femur had been replaced had the poorest prognosis for survival without aseptic loosening. The percentage of bone removed had a significant effect in the proximal tibial replacement group, but the age of the patient did not. By contrast, neither the age nor the percentage of bone removed was a factor after proximal femoral replacement.

The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to mechanical factors.