Femoral component anteversion is an important factor in the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the accuracy of femoral component anteversion with the Mako THA system and software using the Exeter cemented femoral component, compared to the Accolade II cementless femoral component. We reviewed the data of 30 hips from 24 patients who underwent THA using the posterior approach with Exeter femoral components, and 30 hips from 24 patients with Accolade II components. Both groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, BMI, bone quality, or disease. Two weeks postoperatively, CT images were obtained to measure acetabular and femoral component anteversion.Aims
Methods
Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) are performed by surgeons at various stages in training with varying levels of supervision, but we do not know if this is safe practice with comparable outcomes to consultant-performed THA. Our aim was to examine the association between surgeon grade, the senior supervision of trainees, and the risk of revision following THA. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry (NJR) data. We included adult patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis, recorded in the NJR between 2003 and 2016. Exposures were operating surgeon grade (consultant or trainee) and whether or not trainees were directly supervised by a scrubbed consultant. Outcomes were all-cause revision and the indication for revision up to ten years. We used methods of survival analysis, adjusted for patient, operation, and healthcare setting factors.Aims
Methods
The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and to compare the accuracy, patient-reported functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship between rTHA and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA). Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar were performed in April 2020 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “hip”, and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for rTHA (robotic arm-assisted only) and those comparing the implantation accuracy, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mTHA.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to determine the change in the sagittal alignment of the pelvis and the associated impact on acetabular component position at one-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study represents the one-year follow-up of a previous short-term study at our institution. Using the patient population from our prior study, the radiological pelvic ratio was assessed in 91 patients undergoing THA, of whom 50 were available for follow-up of at least one year (median 1.5; interquartile range (IQR) 1.1 to 2.0). Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were obtained in the standing position preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Pelvic ratio was defined as the ratio between the vertical distance from the inferior sacroiliac (SI) joints to the superior pubic symphysis and the horizontal distance between the inferior SI joints. Apparent acetabular component position changes were determined from the change in pelvic ratio. A change of at least 5° was considered clinically meaningful.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to examine the rate at which the
positioning of the acetabular component, leg length discrepancy
and femoral offset are outside an acceptable range in total hip
arthroplasties (THAs) which either do or do not involve the use
of intra-operative digital imaging. A retrospective case-control study was undertaken with 50 patients
before and 50 patients after the integration of an intra-operative
digital imaging system in THA. The demographics of the two groups
were comparable for body mass index, age, laterality and the indication
for surgery. The digital imaging group had more men than the group without.
Surgical data and radiographic parameters, including the inclination
and anteversion of the acetabular component, leg length discrepancy,
and the difference in femoral offset compared with the contralateral
hip were collected and compared, as well as the incidence of altering
the position of a component based on the intra-operative image.Aims
Patients and Methods
Nerve palsy is a well-described complication
following total hip arthroplasty, but is highly distressing and
disabling. A nerve palsy may cause difficulty with the post-operative
rehabilitation, and overall mobility of the patient. Nerve palsy
may result from compression and tension to the affected nerve(s)
during the course of the operation via surgical manipulation and
retractor placement, tension from limb lengthening or compression
from post-operative hematoma. In the literature, hip dysplasia,
lengthening of the leg, the use of an uncemented femoral component, and
female gender are associated with a greater risk of nerve palsy.
We examined our experience at a high-volume, tertiary care referral
centre, and found an overall incidence of 0.3% out of 39 056 primary
hip arthroplasties. Risk factors found to be associated with the
incidence of nerve palsy at our institution included the presence
of spinal stenosis or lumbar disc disease, age younger than 50,
and smoking. If a nerve palsy is diagnosed, imaging is mandatory
and surgical evacuation or compressive haematomas may be beneficial.
As palsies are slow to recover, supportive care such as bracing,
therapy, and reassurance are the mainstays of treatment. Cite this article:
The interaction between the lumbosacral spine
and the pelvis is dynamically related to positional change, and
may be complicated by co-existing pathology. This review summarises
the current literature examining the effect of sagittal spinal deformity
on pelvic and acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty
(THA) and provides recommendations to aid in placement of the acetabular
component for patients with co-existing spinal pathology or long
spinal fusions. Pre-operatively, patients can be divided into four
categories based on the flexibility and sagittal balance of the
spine. Using this information as a guide, placement of the acetabular
component can be optimal based on the type and significance of co-existing
spinal deformity. Cite this article:
Excessive acetabular cover secondary to a retroverted acetabulum causes pincer impingement, which may cause early osteoarthritis of the hip. Our aim was to determine if there was a relationship between acetabular version and osteoarthritis of the hip. Using image processing and analysis software we studied 117 CT images of the hip in patients aged less than 65 years who had undergone a CT virtual colonoscopy. The mean CT joint space of the 18 hips with acetabular retroversion was narrower compared with the 99 hips with normal
Malposition of the acetabular component is a risk factor for post-operative dislocation after total hip replacement (THR). We have investigated the influence of the orientation of the acetabular component on the probability of dislocation. Radiological anteversion and abduction of the component of 127 hips which dislocated post-operatively were measured by Einzel-Bild-Röentgen-Analysis and compared with those in a control group of 342 patients. In the control group, the mean value of anteversion was 15° and of abduction 44°. Patients with anterior dislocation after primary THR showed significant differences in the mean angle of anteversion (17°), and abduction (48°) as did patients with posterior dislocation (anteversion 11°, abduction 42°). After revision patients with posterior dislocation showed significant differences in anteversion (12°) and abduction (40°). Our results demonstrate the importance of accurate positioning of the acetabular component in order to reduce the frequency of subsequent dislocations. Radiological anteversion of 15° and abduction of 45° are the lowest at-risk values for dislocation.
