Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the early 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) HRA in an international multi-centric cohort. Patients undergoing HRA between September 2018 and January 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), HOOS Jr, WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and UCLA Activity Score were collected preoperatively and at 1- and 2-years post-operation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis/loosening and heterotopic ossification formation. 200 patients were identified to have reached 2-year follow-up. Of these, 185 completed PROMS follow-up at 2 years. There was significant improvement in HOOS (p< 0.001) and OHS (p< 0.001) and FJS (p< 0.001) between the pre-operative and 2-year outcomes. Patients reported improved pain (p<0.001), function (p<0.001) and reduced stiffness (p<0.001) as measured by the WOMAC score. Patients had improved activity scores on the UCLA Active Score (P<0.001) with 53% reporting return to impact activity at 2 years. There was no osteolysis and the mean acetabular cup inclination angle was 41deg and the femoral component shaft angle was 137deg. No fractures were reported over but there was one sciatic nerve palsy with partial recovery. Two patients were revised; one at 3 months for pain due to a misdiagnosed back problem and another at 33 months for loosening of the acetabular component with delamination of the titanium ingrowth surface. CoC resurfacing at 2-years post-operation demonstrate promising results with satisfactory PROMS.
The number of revision arthroplasties being performed in the elderly is expected to rise, including revision for infection. The primary aim of this study was to measure the treatment success rate for octogenarians undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to a younger cohort. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality. Patients undergoing one- or two-stage revision of a primary THA for PJI between January 2008 and January 2021 were identified. Age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), McPherson systemic host grade, and causative organism were collated for all patients. PJI was classified as ‘confirmed’, ‘likely’, or ‘unlikely’ according to the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria. Primary outcomes were complications, reoperation, re-revision, and successful treatment of PJI. A total of 37 patients aged 80 years or older and 120 patients aged under 80 years were identified. The octogenarian group had a significantly lower BMI and significantly higher CCI and McPherson systemic host grades compared to the younger cohort.Aims
Methods
Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practiced technique for a variety of indications. In this study we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered stems. From our prospectively collated database we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 – 2013 who had a minimum of two years follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-stem AMT high offset No 1. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment. Ninety-seven patients matched the inclusion criteria. There were 50 Exeter and 47 C-stem AMT components. There were no significant differences between the patient demographics in either group. Mean follow-up was 9.7 years. A significant improvement in OHS, WOMAC and SF-12 scores was observed in both cohorts. Leg lengths were significantly shorter in the Exeter group, with a mean of -4mm in this cohort compared to 0mm in the C-stem AMT group. One patient in the Exeter group had early evidence of radiological loosening. In total, 16 patients (15%) underwent further revision of the femoral component (seven in the C-stem AMT group and nine in the Exeter group). No femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening. There were two cases of femoral component fracture in the Exeter group. Our series shows promising long-term outcomes for the cement-in-cement revision technique using either the Exeter or C-stem AMT components. These results demonstrate that cement-in-cement revision using a double or triple taper-slip design is a safe and reliable technique when used for the correct indications.
Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practised technique for a variety of indications in revision total hip arthroplasty. In this study, we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered femoral components. From our prospectively collated database, we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 to January 2013 who had a minimum of two years' follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-Stem AMT high offset No. 1 prosthesis. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment.Aims
Methods
Noise generation has been reported with ceramic-on-ceramic
articulations in total hip replacement (THR). This study evaluated
208 consecutive Delta Motion THRs at a mean follow-up of 21 months
(12 to 35). There were 141 women and 67 men with a mean age of 59
years (22 to 84). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically,
and the incidence of noise was determined using a newly described
assessment method. Noise production was examined against range of
movement, ligamentous laxity, patient-reported outcome scores, activity
level and orientation of the acetabular component. There were 143
silent hips (69%), 22 (11%) with noises other than squeaking, 17
(8%) with unreproducible squeaking and 26 (13%) with reproducible
squeaking. Hips with reproducible squeaking had a greater mean range
of movement (p <
0.001) and mean ligament laxity (p = 0.004), smaller
median head size (p = 0.01) and decreased mean acetabular component
inclination (p = 0.02) and anteversion angle (p = 0.02) compared
with the other groups. There was no relationship between squeaking
and age (p = 0.13), height (p = 0.263), weight (p = 0.333), body
mass index (p = 0.643), gender (p = 0.07) or patient outcome score
(p = 0.422). There were no revisions during follow-up. Despite the
surprisingly high incidence of squeaking, all patients remain satisfied
with their hip replacement. Cite this article:
We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52° (25 to 140) to 110.41° (80 to 145). Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.
