header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Nov 2014
Viner J Jugdey R Khan S Zubairy A Barrie J
Full Access

Introduction:

Instability and synovitis of the lesser metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joints is a significant cause of forefoot pain. Plantar plate imaging traditionally has been through MRI and fluoroscopic arthrography. We have described ultrasound arthrography as a less resource-intensive technique without radiation exposure. We report the correlation between ultrasound arthographic and surgical findings.

Methods:

Patients with lesser MTP joint instability and pain underwent ultrasound arthrography by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. The main finding was the presence of a full or partial tear of the plantar plate. In some patients the location of the tear along with its size in the long and short axis was also reported.

Authors who were not involved in the imaging or surgery reviewed the operation notes of patients who underwent surgery to identify

Whether a partial or full thickness tear was identified

Size and location of the tear

The accuracy of ultrasound arthrography was calculated using surgical findings as the standard.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 30 - 30
1 Sep 2012
Javed S Khaled Y Hakimi M Faroug R Zubairy A
Full Access

Ankle fractures account for 10% of all fractures. Most deformed looking ankles are manipulated in the emergency departments (ED) on clinical judgement in order to improve the outcome and avoid skin complications. It is accepted that significantly displaced ankle injuries with neurovascular (NV) compromise or critical skin should be reduced prior to imaging.

However, is it really possible to understand the injury to an ankle without an x-ray or other imaging? The other possible injuries around the ankle, presenting with swelling and deformity of the ankle region, may include a ligamentous, talar, subtalar, Chopart joint or calcaneal injury. Does the risk of waiting for the imaging outweigh the benefit of manipulation of an undiagnosed injury?

This prospective study involved the analysis of all patients with ankle injuries referred to orthopaedics between November 2009 and February 2010. Results: Over the audited period 100 referrals were identified (43 male, 57 female). The average age was 50.4 years (range 5–89). Only 2% of fractures were open. Manipulation in the ED was performed for 44% of patients. Of these, 39% (17 cases) were manipulated and supported in plaster slab without an initial x-ray; 3 due to vascular deficit, 2 due to critical skin and 12 with no documented reason!

Re-manipulation in the ED as well as definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were significantly lower in those patients who had an x-ray prior to manipulation (p < 0.05). ORIF was performed in 68% of all patients. Importantly, 80% of ankles manipulated in ED went on to have ORIF which was significantly higher than the 47% in the non-manipulation cohort (p < 0.05).

We conclude that taking ankle injury radiographs prior to any attempt at manipulation, in the absence of NV deficit or critical skin, will constitute best practice.