Whiplash vertigo syndrome is often seen in victims of rear-end vehicle collisions. These patients commonly complain of headache, vertigo, tinnitus, poor concentration, irritability, and sensitivity to noise and light.

Sixteen patients (medium age, 39,5 years) that they refered in orthopaedic examination because of long-lasting subjective complaints after cervical spine injury underwent clinical, laboratorial and psychometric examinations. The mean posttraumatic interval was 43 months. Ten patients were injured in road accidents, 5 during sports and one at work, all with mechanism trial of whip. Each patient was evaluated with otorhinolaryngologic examination, audiometry tests, CT: petrus – internal auditory meatus and cerebellopontine corner. Also each patient was evaluated with neurologic examination, psychological well-being scale (sf-36), and personality profile scale.

None of the patients had neurologic symptoms, and no lesions of the cervical spine were identified. All the patients had negative clinical, radiological and standard laboratorial control, but may be is a critical point that the eleven of these patients had pathologic OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test). Also did not exist differentiations from the mean values in psychological well-being scale (SF-36), and personality profile scale of healthy population. Test results were unrelated to the length of the post-traumatic interval. However, 2 distinct syndromes were identified. Ten patients had cervicoencephalic whiplash type syndrome (CES), characterized by headache, vertigo, tinnitus poor concentration, and disturbed adaptation to light intensity. Six patients had the lower cervical spine whiplash type syndrome (LCSS), characterized by vertigo, tinnitus cervical and cervicobrachial pain.

The verification of Whiplash Vertigo syndrome require more objective clinical means. This article proposes that exists an organic base for the syndrome, but does not promote that whiplash injury certainly cause it

Aim of our study was the investigation and the cross-correlation of various neurologic scales to estimate, comparatively with the functional results of patients after damage of spinal cord injuries.

Between 1989 – 2005, 115 patients were submitted in stabilization of Lower Cervical Spine that was judged unstable.

The neurologic situation was certified with the scales: Frankel, ASIA motor score, NASCIS motor score, FIM scale, and MBI scale.

In the protocol took part the 94 patients for that existed in neurologic details and long follow-up for at least two years.

From the study of course of scores of all scales was not found statistically important difference between ASIA, NASCIS and other motor scales. However 12 patients with important improvement of mobility at ASIA motor score and NASCIS motor score they have not difference in Frankel scale, despite the make that the MRP (Motor Percentage Recovery) was improved: 21.5%

Also 8 patients with relatively big improvement in their total scores did not have corresponding functional improvement (FIM scale, and [MBI] scale)

A lot of neurologic methods – scales were used and are used today. However for the essential and modern follow-up of patients with spinal cord injuries, it needs certification with a scale of classic team of (measurement of mobility) and a scale of functional faculties of the patient

Introduction: Minimally invasive augmentation techniques of vertebral bodies have been widely used in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VBCFs). Kyphoplasty seems to achieve pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, the effect of kyphoplasty on the height and the kyphotic deformity of the vertebrae is now yet clear. The present study reports our experience in kyphoplasty procedures for osteoporotic VBCF’s.

Materials and Methods: A total of 105 VBCF (45 thoracic and 60 lumbar vertebrae) in 56 patients (16 male, 40 female; mean age: 69 years, range 32–87 years) were treated with kyphoplasty between 2002–2005. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with radiographs, MRI and bone scintigraphy, and postoperatively immediately following the procedure and 6 months later with radiographs. Eight patients were treated within a week from their injury (new fractures). All patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire pre- and immediately post-operatively and at 6 months. The height of the treated vertebrae and the kyphotic deformity were measured before, after the kyphoplasty and at 6 months. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia and fluoroscopy guidance.

Results: 54 patients were included in the study; 2 patients expired from causes unrelated to the procedure. All patients experienced pain relief following the procedure and the average Oswestry Disability Index score decreased from 76% preoperatively to 12.4% postoperatively (P< 0.001) and to 18.5% (P< 0.001) at 6 months. The observed mean height restoration at 6 months was 3mm (range 0–15mm) (P=NS) and the kyphotic deformity correction was 3.70 (0–120) (P=NS). In the new fractures the height restoration was 7.1mm and the kyphotic correction 7.80 (P=0.01). There were no cases of pulmonary embolism nor were any significant cement leakages noted.

Conclusion: The treatment of painful osteoporotic VBCFs with kyphoplasty is safe and reduces pain and disability. However, it does not lead to restoration of the vertebral height nor to correction of the kyphotic deformity, except in new fractures.