Osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture (ONFHpoFNFx) poses challenges in children, particularly at Ficat III stage. Limited effective treatments are available. This study explores basicervical femoral neck rotational osteotomy (BFNRO) for ONFHpoFNFx in children and adolescents and evaluates its outcomes. Children and adolescents with ONFHpoFNFx (Ficat stage III) underwent BFNRO at our center from June 2017 to September 2022 were included. Follow-up exceeded 1 year, with data on modified-Harris-hip-score (mHHS), range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction, femoral head collapse, necrotic area repair, leg-length, and osteoarthritis progression recorded. This study included 15 cases (15 hips), with 8 males and 7 females, averaging 12.9 years in age (range: 10–17 years). Nine cases had BFNRO alone, and six had combined PAO. Rotation angles varied from 70° to 90° for anterior rotation and 110° to 135° for posterior rotation. Nine patients had femoral neck fixation in a varus position (10° to 30°). The postoperative contour of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head has significantly improved in all patients. With an average follow-up of 28.6 months (range: 12.2–72.7 months), mHHS significantly improved (65.2 to 90.2, P<0.001). Only one patient showed femoral head collapse. Patients experienced no/mild hip pain (VAS=0-3), slight restriction in range of motion, and mild limb shortening. Two patients showed osteoarthritis progression. No infections, joint replacements, or nerve injuries were observed. Even in cases of ONFHpoFNFx in the late stage, BFNRO in children and adolescents can still yield positive early to mid-term results by relocating the necrotic area and restoring the integrity of the anterior-lateral column of the femoral head, thereby preventing femoral head collapse and delaying the onset of severe osteoarthritis.
Eccentric reductions may become concentric through femoral head ‘docking’ (FHD) following closed reduction (CR) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, changes regarding position and morphology through FHD are not well understood. We aimed to assess these changes using serial MRI. We reviewed 103 patients with DDH successfully treated by CR and spica casting in a single institution between January 2016 and December 2020. MRI was routinely performed immediately after CR and at the end of each cast. Using MRI, we described the labrum-acetabular cartilage complex (LACC) morphology, and measured the femoral head to triradiate cartilage distance (FTD) on the midcoronal section. A total of 13 hips with initial complete reduction (i.e. FTD < 1 mm) and ten hips with incomplete MRI follow-up were excluded. A total of 86 patients (92 hips) with a FTD > 1 mm were included in the analysis.Aims
Methods
The coronal plane lower limb alignment plays an important role in the occurrence and progression in knee osteoarthritis. There have been reports of the valgus knee in patients with unilateral developmental hip dislocation (UDHD) with the relatively small sample size. Besides, few studies have analyzed the lower limb alignment of the contralateral side. The purpose of our study was to identify the coronal plane alignment of both the ipsilateral and the contralateral lower limb in patients with UDHD and find out the difference between patients with Hartofilakidis type II and III. The radiographic data of all UDHD patients who met the inclusion criteria from March 2011 to February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, including the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA). Besides, the femoral torsion angle was measured on the images of CT scan. The average HKA was 3.42°(range: −4.3–12.8°) on the affected side, and −2.11°(range: −11.4–5.4°) on the contralateral side (P?0.0001). The valgus lower limb alignment on ipsilateral side was most frequently seen in both Hartofilakidis type II (20cases, 51.3%) and type III groups (25cases, 67.6%), whereas for the contralateral side, the neutral alignment in type II group (27 cases, 69.2%) and varus alignment in type III group (19 cases, 51.4%) were most commonly observed. Both the mLDFA (P?0.001) and aLDFA (P?0.001) of ipsilateral side were significantly smaller than those of contralateral side. The average femoral torsion angle was 37.9°(range: 10.4–64.4°) on the affected side, and 27.1°(range: 9.7–45.5°) on the contralateral side (P?0.001). In conclusion, UDHD patients may present with lower limb malalignment on both sides. The valgus lower limb alignment is the most common deformity on ipsilateral side, which is caused by increased femoral torsion angle as well as the decreased aLDFA. The patients with Hartofilakidis type III UDHD may be more prone to present varus alignment deformity than those with Hartofilakidis type II on the contralateral side. The lower limb malalignment and deformity of ipsilateral distal femur should be considered during any surgery involving hip, knee or femur.
