Introduction

Primary fixation in uncemented Total Hip Replacement (THR) is achieved by implanting an appropriately sized stem. Last year, in our pilot study, we classified undersizing & reported the incidence of subsidence & radiolucent lines (RLL) in undersized uncemented stems. Now we report on a larger cohort of patients, reporting undersizing and its association with radiolucent lines and subsidence. Secondarily we report on the effect of using a collar, patients' BMI, and in a smaller group the five-year failure rate.

Introduction

Undersizing of an uncemented femoral stem is a post-operative description of a radiograph with unclear clinical importance. It may not always translate into a suboptimal clinical outcome.

Recent studies have demonstrated that implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds exist in unilateral and bilateral metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty patients, with these thresholds being most effective for identifying patients at low-risk of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We investigated whether these new blood metal ion thresholds could effectively identify patients at risk of ARMD in an external cohort of MoM hip arthroplasty patients.

We performed a validation study involving 803 MoM hip arthroplasties implanted in 710 patients at three European centres (323=unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR); 93=bilateral BHR; 294=unilateral Corail-Pinnacle). All patients underwent whole blood metal ion sampling. Patients were divided into those with ARMD (revised for ARMD or ARMD on imaging; n=75), and those without ARMD (n=635). Previously devised implant-specific blood metal ion thresholds (cobalt=2.15μg/l for unilateral BHR; maximum cobalt or chromium=5.5μg/l for bilateral BHR; cobalt=3.57μg/l for unilateral Corail-Pinnacle) were applied to the validation cohort, with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis used to establish the discriminatory characteristics for each respective threshold.

The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for distinguishing between patients with and without ARMD for each implant-specific threshold were respectively: unilateral BHR=89.4% (95% CI=82.8%-96.0%), 78.9%, 86.7%, 44.1%, 96.9%; bilateral BHR=89.2% (95% CI=81.3%-97.1%), 70.6%, 86.8%, 54.5%, 93.0%; unilateral Corail-Pinnacle=76.9% (95% CI=63.9%-90.0%), 65.0%, 85.4%, 24.5%, 97.1%. The 7μg/l UK MHRA threshold missed significantly more patients with ARMD compared with the implant-specific thresholds (4.9% vs. 2.8%; p=0.0003).

This external multi-centre validation study has confirmed that MoM hip arthroplasty patients with blood metal ion levels below newly devised implant-specific thresholds have a low-risk of ARMD. Compared to implant-specific thresholds, the currently proposed fixed MHRA threshold missed more patients with ARMD.

We recommend using implant-specific thresholds over fixed thresholds when managing MoM hip arthroplasty patients.

When inserting a femoral stem, surgeons make use of many visual and tactile cues to be sure that the implant is correctly sized and well-seated. One such cue is the change of pitch that can be heard when the final femoral broach is inserted. This is known to be important, but has not been widely studied.

We set out to analyse the sounds produced during femoral broaching and implant fixation, and to discover whether the absence of these sounds could predict a poor fixation.

We recorded the sound of femoral broaching and definitive implant insertion, for twenty un-cemented Corail total hip replacements. Procedures were performed by the same surgeon, in the same theatre. The recordings were visualised using audio editing software, and a Fast Fourier Transform was used to identify the dominant audio frequencies.

In 19 of the 20 cases, the final strikes of the final femoral broach displayed a distinctive pattern, with the most prominent frequencies being harmonics (multiples of a fundamental frequency) which had a wavelength directly related to the length of the femoral canal. This contrasts with initial strikes, where multiple unrelated frequencies were present.

Postoperative radiographs were examined by two surgeons independently, to assess implant sizing and positioning. The one case, in which the harmonic pattern was not observed, was found on radiographs to be an undersized, varus malpositioned implant.

We demonstrate that a characteristic frequency pattern is present when impacting cancellous bone with a well-sized and well-placed femoral broach. When the pattern was absent, the broach and implant were undersized and malpositioned. We hypothesise that this pattern arises when broach and femur are vibrating as one, indicating adequate contact with, and compression of, cancellous bone.

Introduction

Local commissioning groups are no longer funding outpatient follow up of joint replacements in an effort to save money. We present the costs of changing from traditional follow up methods to a virtual clinic at Warwick Hospital. Before September 2014 all joint replacements were seen in outpatients at six weeks, one year, five years, ten years and then every two years thereafter. They were usually reviewed, in a non-consultant led clinic, by a Band 7 specialist physiotherapist. This cost approximately £50 per patient including x-ray. Occasionally, the patients were seen in a consultant led clinic costing approximately £100.