Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) is an effective joint-preserving surgical treatment for acetabular dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in muscle strength, gait speed, and clinical outcome in the operated hip after RAO over a one-year period using a standard protocol for rehabilitation. A total of 57 patients underwent RAO for acetabular dysplasia. Changes in muscle strength of the operated hip, 10 m gait speed, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score, and factors correlated with hip muscle strength after RAO were retrospectively analyzed.Aims
Patients and Methods
Flexion contracture sometimes occurs after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In most cases, flexion contracture after TKA gradually improves over time. However, some severe cases require manipulation or revision surgery. We searched our clinical database for patients who underwent primary TKA at our institution between 2008 and 2015. By reviewing patient records, we identified three patients (one man and two women) with a severe flexion contracture 30° after primary TKA. Although all three patients gained more than 120° in flexion intraoperatively, they developed flexion contracture after discharge from our institution. We performed manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for all three cases several months later. The two female patients had improved range of motion (ROM) right after the manipulation. However, one of them regained flexion contracture 1 year after the MUA. We report the details of the male patient, who had the worst flexion contracture (−60°). An 80-year-old man had right knee osteoarthritis. His history indicated only hypertension. The right knee ROM before the TKA was −20° extension and 135° flexion. His radiographs showed advanced-stage osteoarthritis. We performed cemented TKA (posterior stabiliser design). Three weeks after the operation, his right knee pain improved. The right knee ROM was −10° extension and 100° flexion just before discharge. However, he returned to our institution because of right knee pain and flexion contracture 31 months after the surgery. The flexion contracture gradually worsened without any trauma. When he returned, the right knee ROM was −60° extension and 135° flexion. Manipulation under general anaesthesia was not effective. Therefore, we performed revision TKA immediately. We excised the scar tissue of the posterior knee joint. Then, we shortened the distal femoral end by 1 cm and reduced the size of the femoral component. After the operation, the right knee ROM was improved to −10° flexion and 130° extension. The reported prevalence of stiffness after TKA was from 1.3% to 13%. Although the deleterious effects of persistent flexion contractures > 15° is well understood, whether they resolve with time or need surgical intervention is controversial. MUA is generally the initial option for patients with flexion contractures, with the possibility of some improvement. If severe flexion contracture remains after manipulation, revision TKA, which may be considered as a useful treatment option, should be considered.
Pelvic osteotomy such as Chiari osteotomy and rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) have been used successfully in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, some patients are forced to undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of the progression of osteoarthritis. THA after pelvic osteotomy is thought to be more difficult because of altered anatomy of the pelvis. We compared six THAs done in dysplastic hips after previous pelvic osteotomy between 2008 and 2015 with a well-matched control group of 20 primary procedures done during the same period. Six THAs for DDH after previous Pelvic osteotomy (three Chiari osteotomies and three RAOs) were compared with 20 THAs for DDH without previous surgery. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI. Minimum follow-up for both groups of patients was one year (range, 12–79 months and 12–77 months, respectively). The average interval from pelvic osteotomy to total hip arthroplasty was 19.8 years (range 12–26 years). Clinical and Radiological evaluations were performed.Introduction
Materials and methods
Proximal femoral osteotomy is an attractive joint preservation procedure for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cause of failure of proximal femoral osteotomy in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Between 2008 and 2014, proximal femoral osteotomy was performed by one surgeon in 13 symptomatic hips. Ten trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomies (anterior: 7, posterior: 3) and 3 intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy were performed. Of the patients, 9 were male and 1 was female, with a mean age at surgery of 36.9 years (range, 25–55 years). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 38 months (range, 12–72 months). Three patients (4 hips) had steroid-induced osteonecrosis, and 7 (9 hips) had alcohol-associated osteonecrosis. At 6 postoperative weeks, partial weight bearing was permitted with the assistance of 2 crutches. At more than 6 postoperative months, full weight bearing was permitted. Patients who had the potential to achieve acetabular coverage of more than one-third of the intact articular surface on preoperative hip radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were considered suitable for this operation. A clinical evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system and a radiologic evaluation were performed. Clinical failure was defined as conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or progression to head collapse and osteoarthritis. The 13 hips were divided into two groups, namely the failure and success groups.Purpose
Patients and Methods
We report an intertrochanteric fracture in a patient who had undergone hip arthrodesis 30 years previously. A 53-year-old man was injured in a head-on car crash and was referred to our hospital for treatment. Plain radiographs showed an intertrochanteric fracture of the right proximal femur and deformity of the right hip joint. He had undergone hip arthrodesis surgery 30 years previously at another hospital. Computed tomography scan showed marked atrophy of the gluteus and iliopsoas muscles. He preferred undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) to internal fixation. THA was performed using the anterolateral approach with the patient in the supine position as he had undergone hip arthrodesis through the Smith–Petersen approach, and we were concerned about damaging the gluteus muscle and dislocation if we took the posterolateral approach. The femoral head was removed using curved chisels under fluoroscopy. A cementless THA (J Taper stem, Aquala polyethylene liner; Kyocera Medical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) was inserted and fixed appropriately. Full weight-bearing using a walking frame was allowed 2 weeks after the surgery. Six months after the operation, he was able to walk independently and had good range of movement of the hip joint but continued to have weakness in the abductor muscles. Very few cases of proximal femur fracture in a previously arthrodesed hip have been reported. Manzotti et al. reported a similar case but they performed open reduction and internal fixation. No previous reports in the literature describe THA for intertrochanteric fracture in an arthrodesed hip. The conversion of an arthrodesed hip to THA is technically challenging. It has a high risk of complications such as nerve injuries and hip instability. We were able to treat the patient successfully, but surgeons should carefully decide the treatment method depending on the case.
