Introduction: We compared femoral head resection (FHR) and traction with femoral head resection and valgus osteotomy (the McHale procedure), in order to determine the effectiveness of these two procedures in the treatment of painful hip subluxation in severely involved individuals with cerebral palsy.

Methods: Retrieval of demographic patient information, operative technique, post-operative complications, and migration of the femoral shaft was obtained from a retrospective review of charts and radiographs. Caregivers were then contacted by telephone and queried regarding post-operative changes in pain, sitting tolerance, and hygiene as well as overall satisfaction with surgical intervention.

Results: 27 patients, 36 hips comprise the study cohort; 26 patients have quadriplegia, one has diplegia and is the only patient who is ambulatory. 16 patients underwent FHR, 11 patients underwent McHale procedures. The average age of surgery was 19 years, range from 8 to 42 years. Average follow-up was 3.4 years from time of surgery. The majority of patients (17) had not undergone reconstructive hip surgery because they were lost to orthopedic follow-up, and missed the opportunity to have the hip relocated before femur was significantly deformed. Six patients had painful hips despite previous attempts at surgery, three patients refused reconstructive surgery, and one patient was not deemed medically stable enough for reconstructive surgery.

Post-operative complications were numerous and included skin breakdown, wound dehiscense, hardware infection or failure, heterotopic ossification, and death. The complication rate was significantly higher in patients who had undergone FHR and traction (13/16) compared with the patients who had a McHale procedure (3/11). The average length of hospitalization was almost twice as long for the FHR group (7 days) as for the McHale group (4 days). Telephone surveys of caregiv-ers often demonstrated equivalent overall satisfaction with surgery in both groups with average scores of 8/10 for the FHR and 7.6/10 for the McHale group (on a scale from 1 to 10, 10 being the most satisfied). Only two of the respondents (one from the FHR group, one McHale) we contacted regretted having had surgery.

Caregivers felt that post-operatively pain relief was achieved in almost all patients. The average time to achieve a more pain-free state was three months. Sitting tolerance improved variably between individual patients, while few caregivers felt that hygiene improved after surgery, although they also felt that hygiene had not been a significant problem pre-operatively.

Joint replacement in HIV-positive patients remains uncommon, with most experience gained in patients with haemophilia. We analysed retrospectively the outcome of 102 replacement arthroplasties in 73 HIV-positive patients from eight specialist haemophilia centres. Of these, 91 were primary procedures. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 39 years, and the median follow-up was for five years. The overall rate of deep sepsis was 18.7% for primary procedures and 36.3% for revisions. This is a much higher rate of infection than that seen in normal populations. A total of 44% of infections resolved fully after medical and/or surgical treatment.

The benefits of arthroplasty in haemophilic patients are well established but the rates of complications are high. As this large study has demonstrated, high rates of infection occur, but survivorship analysis strongly suggests that most patients already diagnosed with HIV infection at the time of surgery should derive many years of symptomatic relief after a successful joint replacement. Careful counselling and education of both patients and healthcare workers before operation are therefore essential.