Debate continues regarding the relative advantages of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Perceived benefits of CoC include longevity, and low wear - in turn limiting the effects of particulate wear debris. However, CoC bearings cost significantly more, and concern remains over the risk of ceramic fracture; a complication not seen with MoP bearings, which are also cheaper. We electronically randomised 268 consecutive patients undergoing THA to receive either a CoC or MoP articulation. Patients aged over 72 were excluded. In all patients the prosthesis used was an uncemented ABG II (Stryker, USA), implanted by one of the two senior authors (HDA, ABM). Patients were scored preoperatively, and at annual follow-up clinics, using SF36, Visual Analogue (VAS), Merle d'Aubigné (MD) and Oxford Hip (OHS) Scores. Satisfaction levels were also documented.Introduction
Method
Deep vein thrombosis(DVT) and pulmonary embolism(PE) are well-recognised complications following lower limb arthroplasty (Cohen et al, 2001). The National Institute for Clinical Excellence and British Orthopaedic Association recommend the use of both mechanical and chemical prophylaxis. At our institute regimens have changed reflecting new developments in the use of thombo-prophylaxis. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of these methods in preventing complications. Since moving from Aspirin and compression stockings (TEDS) only, three different treatment methods were prospectively audited. Regimen 1 consisted of Aspirin (150 mg OD) and TEDS for 6 weeks (n=660). Regimen 2 used Clexane 40mg OD (n=448). Regimen 3 used Rivaroxaban (n=100) as licensed and Regimen 4 Dabigatran (n=185) as licensed. We looked at rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), rates of post op bleeding/haematoma and wound complications. Patients were reviewed prior to discharge, and at a six-week follow-up. Any casualty attendances were also recorded up to 12 weeks post-operatively.Introduction
Methods
A reduced range of movement post total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is a well recognised problem. Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) is a commonly performed procedure in the stiff post operative TKR. Long term results have been variable in the literature. We prospectively followed up 48 patients since 1996 from one centre, over an average of 7.5 years, (range 1 to 10 years) and report on the long term results. The mean time to MUA post TKR was 12.3 weeks (range 3 to 48). Pre MUA, the mean flexion was 53°. The mean immediate passive flexion post MUA was 97°, an improvement of 44° (Range 10° to 90°, CI < 0.05). By one year, the mean flexion was 87°, improvement of 34°, (range −15° to 70°, CI< 0.05). At ten years the mean flexion was 86°. We found no difference between those knees manipulated before or after 12 weeks. In addition there was no difference found in those knees which had a pre TKR flexion of greater or less than 90°. There were no complications as a result of MUA. However, one patient was eventually revised at two years secondary to low grade infection. Our findings show that MUA is safe and effective method at improving the range of motion in a stiff post operative TKR. The improvement is maintained in the long term irrespective of time to MUA and range of motion pre TKR
