Abstract

The ideal operative treatment of displaced sub capital femoral fractures in the elderly is controversial. Recently, randomised controlled trials have suggested a better outcome with the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat displaced intra capsular fractures of the femur for elderly patients in good health. More recently the concept of dual mobility cups is being promoted to avoid dislocations in this cohort of patients. However, overall there is limited evidence to support the choice between different types of arthroplasty. Dislocation remains a main concern with THA, especially when a posterior approach is used.

We analysed the outcome of 115 primary THR (112 cements and 3 uncemented) THR using a posterior approach with soft tissue repair in active elderly patients presenting with displaced intra capsular femoral neck fractures. Size 28 mm head was used in 108 and a size 32 mm head in the rest. All surgery was performed by specialist hip surgeons.

Satisfactory results were noted in terms of pain control, return to pre-morbid activity and radiological evidence of bone implant osteo-integration. The 30-day mortality was nil. There were two dislocations and only one needed revision surgery due to recurrent dislocation.

In conclusion, with optimal patient selection, THA seems to provide a good functional outcome and pain relief in the management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Excellent outcome can be achieved when done well using the standard cemented THR and with 28mm head. A good soft tissue repair and a specialist hip surgeon is preferable.

Background

One of the major concerns of hinge knees have been reported in literature is mechanical failure. Failure in the form of component fracture (2–10%) and hinge dislocation/ failure are worrisome. In addition, higher risk of aseptic loosening with hinge knee prosthesis has been attributed to stress transfer at bone cement interface.

Distal femoral replacement is an operation long considered as salvage operation for neoplastic conditions. Outcomes of this procedure for difficult knee revisions with bone loss of distal femur have been sparsely reported.

We present the early results of complex revision knee arthroplasty using distal femoral replacement implant, performed for severe osteolysis and bone loss.

Retrospective review of clinic and radiological results of 25 consecutive patients operated at single centre between January 2010 and December 2014. All patients had single type of implant. All data was collected till the latest follow up. Re-revision for any reason was considered as primary end point.

Mean age at surgery was 72.2 years (range 51 – 85 years). Average number of previous knee replacements was 2.28 (range 1 to 6). Most common indications were infection, aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture. Average follow up was 24.5 months (range: 3–63 months). 1 patient died 8 months post-op due to unrelated reasons. Re-revision rate was 2/25 (8%) during this period. One was re-revised for aseptic loosening and one was revised for peri-prosthetic fracture of femur. Two other peri-prosthetic fractures were managed by open reduction and internal fixation. All 3 peri-prosthetic fractures occurred with low energy trauma.

It is noteworthy that there was no hinge or mechanical failures of the implant. Peri-prosthetic fracture in 12% of patients in this series is of concern. There are no similar studies to compare this data with. The length of the stem, type of fixation of the stem, weight of the distal femoral component of implant can be postulated as factors contributing to risk of peri-prosthetic fracture.

Primary total hip replacement (THR) in patients with abnormal/altered proximal femoral anatomy/narrow canals presents a technical challenge. There are only limited standard prosthetic stems available to deal with narrow canals or abnormal morphology. Many prefer to use expensive custom implants which often have a lag time to manufacture and do not always have long term published outcomes.

We present results of the Asian C-stem (which is a standard implant available on the shelf) used in patients predominantly of Caucasian origin with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy.

We retrospectively reviewed clinic-radiological results of 131 patients (131 stems) who underwent primary THR using Asian C-stem at Wrightington Hospital till their latest follow up. Revision for any reason was considered as primary end point.

Mean age at surgery was 50.8 years (16 – 80). The 2 commonest indications were primary osteoarthritis (66 patients) and hip dysplasia (54 patients). Mean follow up was 43.5 months with a minimum follow up of 12 months and maximum follow up of 97 months. There were 2 recurrent dislocations and 1 hip subluxed twice. One dislocation needed revision surgery. 1 patient underwent acetabular revision for loosening. There was no stem failure, obvious loosening or loss of fixation in any patients in our series with regards to the Asian C-stem. There were no infections and intra-operative perforations or fractures.

C-stem Asian is a reliable implant for patients undergoing THR with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy or narrow canals. Long term follow up is essential.