Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Oct 2020
Anderson LA Wylie J Erickson JA Peters CL
Full Access

Introduction

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. There remains a lack of consensus regarding whether intra-articular work such as labral repair or improvement of femoral offset should be performed at the time of PAO or addressed subsequent to PAO if symptoms warrant. The purpose of this review was to determine the rate of subsequent hip arthroscopy (HA) in a contemporary PAO cohort with no intra-articular work performed at the time of PAO.

Methods

From June 2012 to September 2019, 272 Rectus Sparing PAOs were performed and followed for a minimum of one year (mean 4.6 years). The average age was 24 (range 14–44) and 87% were female. The average BMI was 25 and average length of hospital stay was 2.9 days. Patients were evaluated at last follow-up with PROMIS PF-CAT, pain and mental health scores. Clinical records were reviewed for complications or subsequent surgery. Pre and post-operative radiographs were reviewed for change in the following acetabular parameters: LCEA, ACEA, AI, and the alpha-angle was obtained from preoperative radiographs. Patients were cross-referenced from the two largest hospital systems in our area to determine if subsequent HA was performed. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze risk factors for HA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_27 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Jul 2013
Green C Nguyen N Wylie J Choudhury A Gregory J
Full Access

Optimising post-operative joint function is challenging when treating periarticular soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates but periarticular fibrosis may adversely affect joint function. Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy requires lower doses and smaller treatment volumes and therefore has potential benefits for the management of periarticular STS, but may lead to an increased risk of post-operative wound complications. This study assesses initial outcome and complications after treatment with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for patients with periarticular STS.

17 patients treated with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery were identified. 3D conformal radiotherapy was delivered at a single centre with a dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly for adverse effects. Resection was planned 4–6 weeks after radiotherapy.

Median follow-up was 13 months (range 5–44 months). No patients had significant adverse effects during radiotherapy. One patient had surgery delayed due to local skin reaction. Minor complications in five patients (three superficial infections, one seroma, one neuropraxia). One patient required further surgery due to incomplete margins. TESS scores for upper and lower limb patients were 86.1 and 78.1 respectively. No cases of local recurrence have occurred to date. Two patients have developed distant metastatic disease.

The early results for periarticular STS managed with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery are excellent. There does not appear to be a significant increase in post-operative complication rates. With neo-adjuvant radiotherapy. Long term follow-up is required to demonstrate final functional outcome and local control rates.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 188 - 188
1 Mar 2006
Hulse N Narayan H Rajashekhar C Paul A Wylie J
Full Access

Background: Skin grafting is one of the simplest techniques of providing skin cover following enbloc resection of soft tissue sarcomas on extremities. But many authors have questioned the tolerance of skin graft to post operative radiotherapy.

Aim: To assess the integrity of skin grafts following post operative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas on extremities.

Material and methods: During the period between 1997 and 2003, 10 patients received postoperative external beam radiotherapy following excision of soft tissue sarcomas on extremities and skin grafting at this regional soft tissue sarcoma unit. Age of these patients ranged from 26 years to 92 years. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the commonly encountered tumour. Commonest site of resection and skin grafting was lower leg. These patients were analysed for interval between skin grafting and radiotherapy, dose, type and fractions of radiation, break in radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and effect of radiation on skin graft.

Results: One patient developed moist desquamation and two developed dry desquamation during the course of treatment. All acute skin reactions were healed within 3 weeks of completion of radiotherapy. No patients required further soft tissue reconstruction.

Conclusion: Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy can be delivered to skin-grafted areas on extremities following enbloc excision of soft tissue sarcomas without any major complications. Our experience indicates that the radiation reaction can be minimised if the graft is allowed to heal adequately prior to the initiation of radiotherapy.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 75 - 75
1 Mar 2005
Hulse N Rajashekhar C Paul A Wylie J
Full Access

Background: Skin grafting is one of the simplest techniques of providing skin cover following enbloc resection of soft tissue sarcomas on extremities. But many authors have questioned the tolerance of skin graft to post operative radiotherapy.

Aim: To assess the integrity of skin grafts following post operative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas on extremities.

Material and methods: During the period between 1997 and 2003, 10 patients received postoperative external beam radiotherapy following excision of soft tissue sarcomas on extremities and skin grafting at this regional soft tissue sarcoma unit. Age of these patients ranged from 26 years to 92 years. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the commonly encountered tumour. Commonest site of resection and skin grafting was lower leg. These patients were retrospectively analysed for interval between skin grafting and radiotherapy, dose, type and fractions of radiation, break in radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and effect of radiation on skin graft. Results: One patient developed moist desquamation and two developed dry desquamation during the course of treatment. All acute skin reactions were healed within 3 weeks of completion of radiotherapy. No patients required further soft tissue reconstruction.

Conclusion: Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy can be delivered to skin-grafted areas on extremities following enbloc excision of soft tissue sarcomas without any major complications. Our experience indicates that the radiation reaction can be minimised if the graft is allowed to heal adequately prior to the initiation of radiotherapy.