The purpose of this investigation is to assess the rate of wear the effect once the “bedding in period”/ poly creep had been eliminated. Creep is the visco-elastic deformation that polyethylene exhibits in the first 6–12 weeks. We also assessed the wear pattern of four different bearing couples in total hip arthroplasty (THA): cobalt-chrome (CoCr) versus oxidized zirconium (OxZir) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) versus highly-crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) acetabular liners. This was a randomized control study involving 92 patients undergoing THA. They were randomized to one of four bearing couples: (1) CoCr/UHMWPE (n= 23), (2) OxZir/UHMWPE (n=21), (3) CoCr/XLPE (n=24), (4) OxZir/XLPE (n=24). Patients underwent a posterior approach from one of three surgeons involved in the study. All patients received a porous-coated cementless acetabular shell and a cylindrical proximally coated stem with 28 mm femoral heads. Each patient was reviewed clinically and radiographically at six weeks, three and 12 months, two, five and 10 years after surgery. Standardized anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken. All polyethylene wear was measured by an independent blinded reviewer. Linear and volumetric wear rates were measured on radiographs using a validated computer software (Polyware Rev. 5). Creep was defined as the wear at 6 or 12 weeks, depending on if there was a more than 10% difference between both measurements. If a greater than 10% difference occurred than the later period's wear would be defined as creep. 72 hips were included in analysis after exclusion of seven revisions, three deaths and 10 losses to follow-up. The annual linear wear rates (in mm/y) at 10 years were (1) 0.249, (2) 0.250, (3) 0.074 and (4) 0.050. After adjusting for creep these rates become were (1) 0.181, (2) 0.142, (3) 0.040 and (4) 0.023. There is statistical differences between raw and adjusted linear wear rates for all bearing couples. The percentage of the radiographically measured wear at 10 years due to creep is (1) 30% (2) 44%, (3) 58.5% and (4) 51.5% with significant differences in couples with XLPE versus those with UHMWPE. There was no significant correlation between age, gender, cup size, tilt, planar anteversion and the linear or volumetric wear rates. The linear wear rate of both UHMWPE and XLPE are even lower thxdsxzan previously described when creep is factored out. XLPE has again demonstrated far superior linear wear rates at 10 years than UHMWPE. There were no significant differences in wear rate at 10 years between CoCr and OxZir, this may be due to an underpowered study. XLPE exhibits proportionally more creep than UHMWPE within the first 6–12 weeks and accounts for more of the total wear at 10 years as measured radiographically at the end period.
During a retrospective case note analysis, a significant difference was found in prosthesis survival, between two cohorts of patients who underwent different total knee replacements. The first cohort included 70 patients who underwent Kinemax Plus total knee replacement, the second cohort included 58 patients who underwent PFC Total Knee replacement. All patients were under the care of one Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon. Interestingly, the Kinemax Plus cohort was found to have a higher rate of revision compared to the PFC cohort. A detailed comparison was carried out between the two groups to identify any obvious cause for the disparity. The two cohorts were found to be well matched with respect to age, sex, ASA grade, underlying pathology and operative technique. Median follow up being 6 years and 5 years for the Kinemax Plus and PFC groups respectively. There were 11 failed prostheses in the Kinemax Plus cohort, 7 undergoing revision with the remaining 4 patients offered revision but unwilling to have surgery. Wear of the polyethylene tibial insert was the most obvious finding at revision, present in six of the seven revisions. 97% of the Kinemax Plus Prostheses were intact at 5 years but by 8 years only 87% were intact. There were no revisions performed in the PFC cohort. Post-operative x-ray analysis was undertaken to rule out prosthesis malalignment as a cause for the increased failure rate. The coronal alignment of the prostheses (CAK) was calculated and all post operative x-rays were within the normal limits of 4-10 degrees. Analysis of the explanted Kinemax Plus polyethylene liners was undertaken. In six cases, the polyethylene bearing surfaces displayed severe surface and subsurface delamination. This suggests massive fatigue and fatigue wear. Only one implant showed localised delamination. These findings suggest the hypothesis of weak polyethylene particle interface strength.
