Modular hip designs offer potential for customising the implant to the patient. However, the more features a device has to offer, the potential for misuse increases. This paper will review one modular stem and the pearls learned over the years to make this a simple and reproducible surgical technique. Over a 1,000 primary THA have been performed since the development of the proximal modular stem in 2000. The two senior surgeons developed the stem design and surgical techniques used and described here. Two additional surgeon co-authors have used the device as described confirming the design and techniques to be simple, reliable and reproducible. Often the tricks of the trade go unpublished and each new surgeon is left to his own learning curve with new devices. As with any surgical instrumentation there are significant little techniques that often make surgery more reproducible and enjoyable. Surgical technique should be simple and reproducible. We have found that even simple procedures—such as head resection—can, and do, impact the surgical process and can affect surgical outcome. Canal reaming, flute engagement, conical reaming, broaching, trochanter clearance, proper use of modular trials and implant assembly all play critical roles to a successful outcome. We have found, and previously reported, that the use of this proximal modular stem design has reduced our leg length inequalities +/− 5 mm and has all but eliminated dislocations and aseptic loosening. There were some mechanical failure problems (previously reported) on the first generation modular junction design that was identified and corrected (never exported outside the U.S.). There have been no reported failures since introduction of the improved modular junction six years ago. Independent selection of femoral offset and vertical height is possible and we feel that restoration of joint mechanics is more reproducible with proximal modular devices as compared to monoblock stems. It is the responsibility of surgeons to communicate their understanding and experience with newer devices and not rely on industry to fill this function.
Hip simulator studies on MOM bearings have historically involved ‘custom’ cetabular cups. I.e. having neither beaded layers nor biological coatings. The aim of this study was to investigate wear using such MOM bearings and evaluate the potential wear and evaluate the potential for error in the gravimetric assessment. Six x 38 mm HC Co-Cr bearings were supplied (Global and IO International Orthopaedics). The cups were received in ‘off-the-shelf’ condition with a cast Co-Cr beaded/HA-coated backing. To remove the HA-coating, the cups were pre-soaked in lemon juice for 4 days (articular surfaces shielded). Custom plastic fixtures were machined to fit the beaded contours of the cups. Test duration was 5Mc inorbital hip simulator (Shore-Western). MOM wear was estimated from serum ion contamination. Serum samples were digested and assessed using ICP/MS (Weck Labs Inc, CA). The majority of the HA-coating was removed from the cups after four days of soaking inlemon juice after 21 days of soaking all cup weights appeared atable (within 1 mg). Reflected-light microscopy (RLM) showed no descernible signs of HA and the total weight loss due to HA remval averaged∼400mg. During hip simulator there was no visual evidence of lost or broken beads, 3rd body abrasion etc (Sa<30nm). Both gravimetric and metal ion analysis showed consistent wear trends for all MOM cups. The MOM with the highest wear (predicted by ion analysis) demonstrated 1.2 mm (3)/Mc)OWR) at 5Mc. In comparsion, gravimetric analysis predicted an OWR of 1.3 mm (3)Mc for the same MOM, a difference of only 8%. Soaking beaded-HA cups in lemon juice and BCS proved effective in removing the coating. The beaded cups remained stable in weight during the wear study and caused little discrepancy in gravimetric analysis (8%). The method described did not lead to breaking of beads, elevated 3rd-body abrasion, cup damage or distorted wear scars.
