Advanced practice physiotherapists (APPs) manage the national low back and radicular pain pathway across the UK. A novel spinal APP-led same-day emergency care (SDEC) pathway in Nottingham, manages patients referred from community services and the emergency department (ED). Patients may attend ED in the belief their pain is due to sinister or ‘red flag’ pathology. Little data exists on prevalence of spinal ‘red flag’ pathologies within a secondary care setting. This paper aims to review the number of ‘red flag’ pathology identified by APP's on a same-day emergency care pathway. Retrospective data from 1 year of routinely collected information was extracted and analysed by two APPs. Counts were reported as a percentage of total patients seen on the SDEC unit over a one-year period and compared to nationally reported figures. A total of 2042 patients were assessed on the unit in 2021, of which, 293 (14%) had serious pathology identified. Patients were classified into type of serious pathology: myelopathy (126, 6.1%), fractures (72, 3.5%), cauda equine compression (40, 1.9%), infection (37, 1.8%), cancers (28, 1.3%), neurological conditions (14, 0.6%) and other (16, 0.8%) serious pathology.Introduction
Methods
NHS improvement advocates same day emergency care (SDEC) for patients requiring additional specialism than can be provided in an Emergency Department. A novel physiotherapist-led spinal SDEC unit was established in January 2020, integrated within the on-call spinal service. The aim of this paper was to evaluate patient and peer satisfaction with the spinal SDEC. Patient satisfaction questionnaires and/or friends and family tests were collected from patients over a six-month period. Questionnaires evaluated satisfaction with recommendations given, service given, staff friendliness. Anonymous, completed questionnaires were uploaded onto a spreadsheet. Peer satisfaction was assessed using a google sheets document emailed to interface, primary care and community services. The questionnaire captured the respondents’ role, how many patients they had referred to the SDEC, reasons for referral, ease of referral, and compared this new pathway with the previous pathway. All patient's satisfaction responses recommended the service to family and friends (n=110 extremely likely, 8 likely) (6% total seen). All respondents were satisfied with the service they received (n=80 very satisfied, n=12 satisfied) and recommendations made (n=86 very satisfied, n=6 satisfied). Of peer satisfaction, 26 respondents (n=12 (46%) physiotherapists, n=6 (23%) first contact practitioners, n=6 (23%) advanced practice physiotherapists, n=1 (4%) GP, n=1 (4%) nurse) reported the SDEC delivered a better pathway and outcomes (n=25, 96%), and 20 (77%) respondents reported favourable comments of the service and its impact on patients and referrers.Background
Methods
Advanced spinal practitioner physiotherapists (ASPPs) assess and manage spinal referrals, as advocated by the National Low Back Pain Pathway in the United Kingdom. The ASPP pathway relies on multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings where potential surgically appropriate or complex cases can be discussed. Meetings were held with two different Consultant Spinal Neurosurgeons (total 2 meetings per month). The aim of this service evaluation was to assess MDT meeting outcomes and surgical listing. This retrospective service evaluation used routinely collected MDT meeting documentation between May 2019 and October 2021. Data was extracted by two ASPPs, and 20% checked by a third ASPP. Extracted data included: number of patients discussed, Consultant, reason for discussion, and outcome (surgical listing or other). Data was analysed by two ASPPs using pivot tables in Microsoft Excel and was reported using counts and percentages across month and year.Background
Methods
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is associated with progressive neurological deterioration. Surgical decompression can halt but not reverse this progression. The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment (MJOA) tool is recommended by international guidelines to grade disease severity into mild, moderate and severe, where moderate and severe are both recommended to undergo surgical intervention. During Covid-19 Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, identified DCM patients as high risk for sustaining permanent neurological damage due to surgical delay. The Advanced Spinal Practitioner (ASP) team implemented a surveillance project to evaluate those at risk. A spreadsheet was compiled of all DCM patients known to the service. Patients were telephoned (Oct-Nov 2021) by an ASP. MJOA score was recorded and those describing progressive deterioration were reviewed by the ASP team on a spinal same day emergency assessment unit. Incident forms were completed for clinical deterioration and recorded as severe harm. Acute, progressive neurological deterioration was fast tracked for emergency surgical decompression.Introduction
Methods
Scoliosis is described as a lateral spinal curvature exceeding ten degrees on radiograph with vertebral rotation. Approximately 80% of scoliosis presentations are adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Current management for AIS in the UK occurs in Surgeon or Paediatrician-led clinics and can be conservative or surgical. The musculoskeletal assessment and triage of AIS appears well-suited to an advanced physiotherapist practitioner (APP) skill set. The aim of this service evaluation was to scope, develop, implement and evaluate a four-month pilot of an APP-led AIS triage pathway. Spinal Consultant deformity and scoliosis clinics were scoped and observed. Clinic inclusion criteria and a patient assessment form was developed. An APP AIS clinic was set up beside a consultant led clinic. All patients assessed were discussed with a spinal surgeon. Consultant and APP agreement (% of total), waiting times, surgical conversion, and patient satisfaction were reviewed. A clinical competency package was developed for training and development of APPs. A total of 49 patients were seen (20 sessions). Waiting list reduced from 10 weeks to 6 weeks. 45%(n=22) of new patients seen were diagnosed with AIS, 27% (n=6) were directly listed for surgery. Consultant/ APP percentage agreement was high for Cobb angle measurement (82%), management plans (90%), and further diagnostic requests (94%). There were no adverse events and high patient satisfaction levels (n=20), (100% Very satisfied or satisfied) were reported.Background
Method and Results
Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal condition requiring emergency spinal surgery once diagnosed. The patient-reported symptoms are often subtle and none have been shown to be sensitive or specific in confirming CES. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) is the diagnostic gold standard, and guidelines recommend MRI access within 24-hours of symptom presentation. Limited sequence MRI scans (sagittal T2 sequences of the whole spine) have been shown to successfully identify patients with scan-positive CES despite reducing the duration of an MRI. The aim of this audit was to examine utilisation of same-day MRI requests by spinal practitioners from a newly operational same-day emergency care spinal unit over the two-year period. Data was routinely collected over the two-year period and retrospectively reviewed. Data extraction occurred for cases of suspected CES with a same-day scan. Data extraction included type of MRI scan (lumbar/ whole spine/ CES protocol); outcome (admission/ discharge); final diagnosis. After clinical examination, only 258 (24% of 1085) suspected CES cases were identified and scanned within 24 hours, 58% (n=149) of which were with CES limited sequence scans. Only 12% (n=30) demonstrated scan- positive CES resulting in surgery within 24-hours. MRI same-day requests increased between 2020 (n=81, 21%) and 2021 (n=177, 26%), although utilisation of limited sequence scans improved (n=39, 48% in 2020; n=109, 62% in 2021).Background
Methods and results
Despite several hundred RCTs of exercise for persistent non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), the treatment targets of exercise are unclear. In a systematic review we observed 30 direct and indirect treatment targets of exercise described across 23 RCTs for persistent NSLBP. Since not all treatment targets and outcomes can be assessed in all RCTs, it is therefore important to prioritise these treatment targets through consensus from key stakeholders. These consensus workshops aimed to agree treatment targets for the use of exercise interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in persistent NSLBP using nominal group workshop (NGW) methodology. The first UK workshop included people who had experience of exercise to manage their persistent NSLBP, clinicians who prescribe exercise for persistent NSLBP, and researchers who design exercise interventions tested in RCTs. The second workshop included participants attending an international back and neck pain research workshop. Twelve participants took part in the UK NGW and fifteen took part in the final ranking of the exercise treatment targets. In addition to the original list of 30 treatment targets, a further 26 ideas were generated. After grouping and voting, 18 treatment targets were prioritised. The top five ranked targets of exercise interventions for persistent NSLBP were: pain reduction, improvement in function, reduction of fear of movement, encouragement of normal movement and improvement of mobility. The results of the international NGW will also be presented.Background and Aim of Study
Methods and Results
Complex interventions, such as exercise for LBP, often have many treatment targets. Matching a primary outcome to the target(s) of exercise interventions may provide greater standardized mean differences (SMDs) than using an unmatched primary outcome. We aimed to explore whether the conclusions of exercise trials for LBP might differ with i) improved matching of outcomes to treatment targets and ii) the use of composite outcome measures. We investigated i) matching in five trials (n=1033) that used an unmatched primary outcome but included some of their matched outcomes as secondary outcomes; ii) composite outcomes in four trials (n=864). The composite consisted of standardised averaged matched outcomes. All analyses replicated the primary outcome analysis, applied to the matched or composite outcome in each dataset. When not possible, SMDs were calculated for the primary and matched outcomes. i) Of five trials, three had greater SMDs and increased statistical significance with matched outcomes (pooled effect SMD 0.35 (95% CI 0.16, 0.54), p=0.0003) compared to an unmatched primary outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.13 (95% CI 0.04, 0.23) p=0.007). ii) Of four composite outcomes: two matched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the primary outcome than the composite outcome; two unmatched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the composite compared to the primary outcome.Background
Methods and Results
Exercise is a complex intervention, and often has more than one treatment target. Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) typically show small to moderate effect sizes, but these may differ where outcomes better reflect the targets of interventions. This review aimed to describe what treatment targets, outcome domains and primary outcome measures are used in exercise RCTs, and examined how well the selected outcome domains match the treatment targets used in each RCT. A computer-aided literature search was performed in eight databases, from inception to August 2018. Inclusion criteria: RCTs in CLBP, exercise compared to a non-exercise arm, sample size >60 per arm. Title and abstract review, subsequent full text review, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by pairs of reviewers. Of 18251 initially identified titles and abstracts, 23 trials were included in the review. 30 treatment targets were extracted, and 6 primary outcome domains identified. A logic model of the treatment targets and outcomes demonstrated diverse relationships. Only 5 RCTs matched their primary outcome domain to the identified treatment targets, 12 used primary outcomes that did not match the reported treatment targets, and 6 were partially matched.Background
Methods and Results
