To validate the Sydney Hamstring Origin Rupture Evaluation (SHORE), a hamstring-specific clinical assessment tool to evaluate patient outcomes following surgical treatment. A prospective study of 70 unilateral hamstring surgical repairs, with a mean age of 47.3 years (15 to 73). Patients completed the SHORE preoperatively and at six months post-surgery, and then completed both the SHORE and Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) at three years post-surgery. The SHORE questionnaire was validated through the evaluation of its psychometric properties, including; internal consistency, reproducibility, reliability, sensitivity to change, and ceiling effect. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis to examine the strength of association between the SHORE and the PHAT.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to assess radiologically the absorption of a poly L-lactide bioabsorbable interference screw used in anterior ligament reconstruction. A case series of ten sequential patients undergoing anterior ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstrings technique were assessed with MRI scans at one, two, four, seven and ten years postoperatively. The scans were reported by an independent radiologist, with respect to resorption of the screw and post resorption changes in the bone. Fixation of the graft in ACL surgery is varied from metal interference screw, resorbable screws made of PLLA, and staple fixation. The advantage of resorbable screws allow imaging of the knee postoperatively, and the perceive benefit of screw resorption and replacement with host bone.Purpose
Methods
Incomplete avulsion of the proximal hamstrings
can be a severely debilitating injury that causes weakness, pain
while sitting and inability to run. The results of the surgical treatment
of 23 consecutive patients with such injuries at least two years
after surgery are described. The surgery consisted of the repair
of the hamstrings directly onto the ischial tuberosity. At review,
using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 to 100), pain while sitting improved
from a mean of 40 (0 to 100) to 64 (0 to 100) (p = 0.024), weakness
from a mean of 39 (0 to 90) to 76 (7 to 100) (p = 0.0001) and the
ability to run from a mean of 24 (0 to 88) to 64 (0 to 95) (p =
0.0001). According to a VAS, satisfaction was rated at a mean of
81 (0 to 100) and 20 patients (87%) would have the same procedure
again. Hamstring strength measured pre- and post-operatively had
improved significantly from a mean of 64% (0% to 95%) to 88% (50%
to 114%) compared with the normal side. Most of these patients with symptomatic incomplete hamstring
avulsions unresponsive to conservative treatment had an improved
outcome after surgical repair.
