Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 92 - 92
1 Jul 2014
Wong H Chu P Cheung K Luk K Yeung K
Full Access

Summary

A promising approach to stimulate in vivo bone formation by using our newly developed magnesium-based bone substitutes, which can be an alternative to treat the patients with bone loss in addition to the anticatabolic drugs and growth factors.

Introduction

Bone impairment arising from osteoporosis as well as other pathological diseases is a major health problem. Anti-catabolic drugs such as bisphosphonates and other biological agents such as bone morphogenetic proteins and insulin-like growth factor can theoretically apply to stimulate bone formation. However, the formation of more brittle bone and uncontrolled release rate are still a challenge nowadays. Hence, we propose to stimulate bone formation by using a newly developed magnesium-based bone substitute. Indeed, the presence of magnesium ions can stimulate bone growth and healing by enhancing osteoblastic activity. This study aims to investigate the mechanical, in vitro and in vivo properties of this novel bone substitute.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 296 - 296
1 Jul 2014
Liu G Tan B Riew D Wong H
Full Access

Summary Statement

Tandem stenosis is a prevalent condition in an Asian population with the narrowest cervical canal diameters and risk factors include advanced age and increased levels of lumbar canal stenosis.

Introduction

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as patient with concomitant spinal canal stenosis found in both cervical (C) and lumbar (L) spinal region. Few studies have reported the incidence of TSS is ranged from 5–25%, but these are all noncomparative, small cohort studies. To the best of author knowledge this is the 1st study aims to compare the prevalence of TSS and its risk factors of development in a large multiracial Asian population.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 312 - 312
1 Jul 2014
Malhotra R Kumar N Wu P Zaw A Liu G Thambiah J Wong H
Full Access

Summary

Metastatic spinal disease is a common entity of much debate in terms of ideal surgical treatment. The introduction of MIS can be a game-changer in the treatment of MSD due to less peri-operative morbidity and allowing earlier radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

Introduction

Less invasive techniques have always been welcome for management of patients with ‘Metastatic Spinal Disorders’. This is because these patients can be poor candidates for extensive / major invasive surgery even though radiologically, there may be an indication for one. The aim of the treatment with Minimal Invasive Fixation (MIS) systems is mainly for ‘pain relief’ than to radically decrease tumour burden or to achieve near total spinal cord decompression, which could be major presentations in these patients. These procedures address the ‘spinal instability’ very well and they can address pain associated with compression fractures resulting from metastatic disease from a solid organ as well as multiple myeloma with minimal complications. These procedures can be combined with radiology and chemotherapy without much concern for wound problems in the way of infection or dehiscence. They also have a great advantage of timing of adjunct therapy closer to the index procedure. The disadvantage, however, are they do not allow thorough decompression of the spinal cord. There could also be problem in addressing patients who have severe vertebral height loss or loss of integrity of the anterior column where anterior column reconstruction may be required. There is a risk of inadequate fixation or implant loosening or failure. We aim to examine the results of MIS surgery in our department and support the rationale for its use.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 310 - 310
1 Jul 2014
Kumar N Chen Y Ahmed Q Lee V Wong H
Full Access

Summary

This is the first ever study to report the successful elimination of malignant cells from salvaged blood obtained during metastatic spine tumour surgery using a leucocyte depletion filter.

Introduction

Catastrophic bleeding is a significant problem in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). However, intaoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has traditionally been contraindicated in tumour surgery because of the theoretical concern of promoting tumour dissemination by re-infusing tumour cells into the circulation. Although IOCS has been extensively investigated in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers, to date, there is no prior report of the use of IOCS in MSTS. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate whether LDF can eliminate tumour cells from blood salvaged during MSTS.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 309 - 309
1 Jul 2014
Chen Y Tai B Nayak D Kumar N Goy R Wong H
Full Access

Summary

Our meta-analysis showed that pooled mean blood loss during spinal tumour surgeries was 2180 ml. Standardised methods of calculating and reporting intra-operative blood loss are needed as it would be beneficial in the pre-operative planning of blood replenishment during surgery.

Introduction

The vertebral column is the commonest site of bony metastasis, accounting for 18,000 new cases in North America yearly. Patients with spinal metastasis are often elderly, have compromised cardiovascular status, poor physiological reserve and altered immune status, all of which render them more susceptible to the complications of intra-operative blood loss and associated transfusion. Currently no consensus exists regarding the expected volume of blood lost during metastatic spine tumour surgery with various papers quoting anywhere between 1L to 6L. Knowledge of the expected blood loss prior to surgery however is important as it facilitates pre-operative planning, intra- and post-operative management of fluid balance and blood transfusion. We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature on spine tumour surgery to answer the question: “What is the expected blood loss in major spinal tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disease?”


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 311 - 311
1 Jul 2014
Kumar N Chen Y Zaw A Ahmed Q Soong R Nayak D Wong H
Full Access

Summary

There is emerging evidence of successful application of IOCS and leucocyte depletion filter in removing tumour cells from blood salvaged during various oncological surgeries. Research on the use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS is urgently needed.

Introduction

Intra-operative cell salvage (IOCS) can reduce allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in non-tumour related spinal surgery. However, IOCS is deemed contraindicated in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) due to risk of tumour dissemination. Evidence is emerging from different surgical specialties describing the use of IOCS in cancer surgery. We wanted to investigate if IOCS is really contraindicated in MSTS. We hereby present a systematic literature review to answer the following questions: 1. Has IOCS ever been used in MSTS? 2. Is there any evidence to support the use of IOCS in other oncologic surgeries?