The management of fractures of the medial epicondyle is one of the greatest controversies in paediatric fracture care, with uncertainty concerning the need for surgery. The British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery prioritized this as their most important research question in paediatric trauma. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled, multicentre, prospective superiority trial of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced medial epicondyle fractures: the Surgery or Cast of the EpicoNdyle in Children’s Elbows (SCIENCE) trial. Children aged seven to 15 years old inclusive, who have sustained a displaced fracture of the medial epicondyle, are eligible to take part. Baseline function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb score, pain measured using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for younger patients (EQ-5D-Y) will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified using a minimization algorithm by centre and initial elbow dislocation status (i.e. dislocated or not-dislocated at presentation to the emergency department)) to either a regimen of the operative fixation or non-surgical treatment.Aims
Methods
This purpose of this study was to investigate whether prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis affects subsequent femoral morphology. To determine the effect of prophylactic pinning on growth we compared contralateral hip radiographs of 24 proximal femora prophylactically pinned with 26 cases observed, in a cohort of patients with unilateral SUFE. Validated measurements were used to determine hip morphology; the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance (TTD) to articulo-trochanteric distance (TTD:ATD) in addition to direct measurement of the femoral neck length. Post-operative radiographs were compared to radiographs taken at a 12–84 months follow-up. Comparing pinned and unpinned hips the neck length was shorter (mean 5.1 mm vs 11.1 mm) and the ATD was lower (p=0.048). The difference between initial and final radiograph TTD:ATD ratio for each case was calculated. The average was 0.63 in the prophylactically pinned group and 0.25 in the unpinned group (p=0.07). When hips of the same patient were compared on final radiographs, there was a smaller difference in TTD:ATD between the two sides when the patient had been prophylactically pinned (0.7) as opposed to observed (1.47). This was not statistically significant (p=0.14). Universal prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and alteration of the proximal femoral morphology is one reason for this. Our results show that prophylactic pinning does not stop growth but does alter subsequent proximal femoral morphology by causing a degree of coxa vara and breva. Some loss of growth in the prophylactically pinned hip contributes to reduction in leg length inequality at skeletal maturity which is advantageous. No iatrogenic complications were observed with single cannulated screw fixation. Prophylactic pinning prevents the potential catastrophe of a subsequent slip, is safe and the effect on growth is, if anything, beneficial. Level of evidence: III
Case Report presentation of traumatic cartilage loss in a child. We present a case report of a 3-year-old girl who sustained a severe open fracture dislocation of her talus with complete loss of full thickness articular cartilage and subchondral bone over 80% of the talar dome. At presentation there was also a Salter Harris I fracture of the fibular, and an extensive soft tissue defect including absent anterior joint capsule. She required a free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap to reconstruct this defect. The talar dome defect was treated with a cell-free chondro-inductive implant. This was the first use of this implant in the UK and the first use of such an implant in a child anywhere in the world.Aim
Method
We have reviewed the complication rate over a ten year period for removal of screws placed for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and have surveyed the views of orthopaedic surgeons with an adult hip practice in Scotland on leaving the metalwork in situ. Whilst screw removal is favoured by many orthopaedic surgeons, a recent review of the literature reported that the complication rate for removal of implants placed for SCFE was 34%. Between 1998 and 2007 84 patients had insertion of screws for SCFE. Of these 54 patients had screws removed, 51 of these records were available. The median duration between insertion and removal of screws was 2 yrs 7 months. Of the 51 children, overall five (9.8%) had complications - three (5.9%) major and two (3.9%) minor. Two screws could not be removed; one patient sustained a fracture after screw removal and two developed an infection. We assessed the attitudes of adult hip surgeons on this topic using an electronic questionnaire which was completed by 29 out of 40 recipients. 78.6% of respondents support routine removal and 21.4% favour leaving the screw permanently in place. 82.2% had needed to remove metalwork from a hip requiring arthroplasty in a patient whose metalwork was inserted during childhood; and described their experience of this including the complications encountered. We have identified a lower complication rate following screw removal inserted for SCFE than in published series. Most adult hip surgeons support routine removal once the physis is closed but studies regarding the long-term outcome of retained orthopaedic implants are needed since even with this lower complication rate the question of routine removal remains unclear.
