The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance
and safety of magnetically controlled growth rods in the treatment
of early onset scoliosis. Secondary aims were to evaluate the clinical
outcome, the rate of further surgery, the rate of complications,
and the durability of correction. We undertook an observational prospective cohort study of children
with early onset scoliosis, who were recruited over a one-year period
and followed up for a minimum of two years. Magnetically controlled
rods were introduced in a standardized manner with distractions
performed three-monthly thereafter. Adverse events which were both related
and unrelated to the device were recorded. Ten children, for whom
relevant key data points (such as demographic information, growth
parameters, Cobb angles, and functional outcomes) were available,
were recruited and followed up over the period of the study. There
were five boys and five girls. Their mean age was 6.2 years (2.5
to 10).Aims
Patients and Methods
Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allow non-invasive
correction of the spinal deformity in the treatment of early-onset
scoliosis. Conventional growing rod systems (CGRS) need repeated
surgical distractions: these are associated with the effect of the
‘law of diminishing returns’. The primary aim of this study was to quantify this effect in
MCGRs over sequential distractions. A total of 35 patients with a maximum follow-up of 57 months
were included in the study. There were 17 boys and 18 girls with
a mean age of 7.4 years (2 to 14). True Distraction (TD) was determined
by measuring the expansion gap on fluoroscopy. This was compared
with Intended Distraction (ID) and expressed as the ‘T/I’ ratio.
The T/I ratio and the Cobb angle were calculated at several time
points during follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study
to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled
growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children
with early-onset scoliosis. Between January 2011 and January 2015, 19 children were treated
with magnetically-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and underwent
distraction at three-monthly intervals. The mean age of our cohort
was 9.1 years (4 to 14) and the mean follow-up 22.4 months (5.1
to 35.2). Of the 19 children, eight underwent conversion from traditional growing
rods. Whole spine radiographs were carried out pre- and post-operatively:
image intensification was used during each lengthening in the outpatient
department. The measurements evaluated were Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis,
proximal junctional kyphosis and spinal growth from T1 to S1.Aims
Patients and Methods
We assessed the frequency and causes of neurological
deterioration in 59 patients with spinal cord injury on whom reports
were prepared for clinical negligence litigation. In those who deteriorated
neurologically we assessed the causes of the change in neurology
and whether that neurological deterioration was potentially preventable.
In all 27 patients (46%) changed neurologically, 20 patients (74%
of those who deteriorated) had no primary neurological deficit.
Of those who deteriorated, 13 (48%) became Frankel A. Neurological
deterioration occurred in 23 of 38 patients (61%) with unstable
fractures and/or dislocations; all 23 patients probably deteriorated
either because of failures to immobilise the spine or because of
inappropriate removal of spinal immobilisation. Of the 27 patients who
altered neurologically, neurological deterioration was, probably,
avoidable in 25 (excess movement in 23 patients with unstable injuries,
failure to evacuate an epidural haematoma in one patient and over-distraction following
manipulation of the cervical spine in one patient). If existing
guidelines and standards for the management of actual or potential
spinal cord injury had been followed, neurological deterioration
would have been prevented in 25 of the 27 patients (93%) who experienced
a deterioration in their neurological status. Cite this article:
To determine extent of correction in spinal osteotomy for fixed sagittal plane deformity Radiographic retrospective cohort analysis using standardised standing whole spine radiographs. Level III evidence 24 patients (14 females/10 males, av. 53.6 yrs) with sagittal plane deformity due to either ankylosing spondylitis (4), idiopathic (12), congenital (1), tumour (2), infectious (1), or posttraumatic (4) aetiologies. Max. 4 yrs follow up Sagittal balance, lumbar lordosis correction, osteotomy angle, pelvic indices Chevron (3), pedicle subtraction (17), and vertebral column resection (4) osteotomies were performed with the majority at L3 (9) and L2 (8). The C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis demonstrated a preoperative decompensation averaging 12.0 cm (range -7 to 37) with 55% of patients achieving normal sagittal balance postoperatively. Lumbar lordosis increased from 28.9° (range -28 to 63) to 48.9° (range 12 to 69) (22.3° av. correction). L3 osteotomy angle was largest, average 31° (range, 16 to 47). There were 11 complications comprising; major (1) and minor (1) neurological, junctional kyphosis (3), metalwork problems (2), dural tear (2) and infection (2). Four patients required additional surgery at latest follow-up. Technical outcome was good 11(50%), fair 8(36%), poor 3(14%). Spinal osteotomy is a very effective technique to correct fixed sagittal imbalance and provide biomechanical stability. The high complication rate mandates a careful assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before undertaking what is a major reconstructive procedure. Most patients are satisfied, particularly when sagittal balance is achieved.
To compare the effect of intraoperative red cell salvage on blood transfusion and cost in patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Retrospective 37 patients (36 females, 1 male) underwent scoliosis surgery from February 2007 to October 2008. Intraoperative red cell salvage (Group 1) was used. They were compared with 28 patients (23 females, 5 males) operated from January 2005 to December 2006 without the use of cell salvage (Group 2). 36 patients in group 1 had posterior surgery and 1 had anterior surgery. In Group 2, 20 patients had posterior surgery, 7 anterior and 1 patient had anterior and posterior surgery. Both groups were comparable for age, number of levels fused, preoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit values. Amount of perioperative blood transfusion, costs 14 patients (50%) in group 2 had blood transfusion whereas only 6 (16%) were transfused blood in group 1. Average blood loss in group 1 was 1076 mls (range 315-3000) and 1626mls (419-4275) in group 2. An average of 2 units of packed red blood cells per patient was processed by the cell salvage system. Postoperative haemoglobin, haematocrit and hospital stay were comparable in both groups. Cost analysis shows the use of cell salvage is cost beneficial by £116.60 per case. The use of red blood cell salvage reduces the amount of blood transfusion and is cost beneficial.
A literature review of bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion was undertaken from peer reviewed journals to form a basis for guidelines on their clinical use. A PubMed search of peer reviewed journals between Jan 1960 and Dec 2009 for clinical trials of bone graft substitutes in spinal fusion was performed. Emphasis was placed on RCTs. Small and duplicated RCTs were excluded. If no RCTs were available the next best clinical evidence was assessed. Data were extracted for fusion rates and complications. Of 929 potential spinal fusion studies, 7 RCTs met the inclusion criteria for BMP-2, 3 for BMP-7, 2 for Tricalcium Phosphate and 1 for Tricalcium Phosphate/Hydroxyapatite (TCP/HA). No clinical RCTs were found for Demineralised Bone Matrix (DBM), Calcium Sulphate or Calcium Silicate. There is strong evidence that BMP-2 with TCP/HA achieves similar or higher spinal fusion rates than autograft alone. BMP-7 achieved similar results to autograft. 3 RCTs support the use of TCP or TCP/HA and autograft as a graft extender with similar results to autograft alone. The best clinical evidence to support the use of DBMs are case control studies. The osteoinductive potential of DBM appears to be very low however. There are no clinical studies to support the use of Calcium Silicate. The current literature supports the use of BMP-2 with HA/TCP as a graft substitute. TCP or HA/TCP with Autograft is supported as a graft extender. There is not enough clinical evidence to support other bone graft substitutes. This study did not require ethics approval and no financial support was received.
To establish the incidence of litigation in Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) and the causes of litigation. Review of 10 years of abbreviated records of the National Health Service litigation authority (NHSLA) (1997-2007) and eight years of medical negligence cases (MNC) reported on by the two senior authors (2000-2008). Patients who experienced CES and litigated. There were 117 patients in the NHSLA records and 23 patients in the MNC group. Review of timing of onset, delay in diagnosis, responsible specialist, place, and resulting symptoms NHSLA cases. 62/117 cases were closed. The responsible specialists were as follows
The commonest failure was delay in diagnosis, and the commonest complications were “neurological”, bladder and bowel. MNC cases. F:M;17/6. L4/5 13 cases, L5/S1 9 cases. The responsible specialist was orthopaedic (7), other (7) and in 8 cases the opinion was that there was no case to answer. Delay to treatment averaged 6.14 days. 18/23 patients described bowel and bladder symptoms, the information was not available in the remainder. Litigation is major problem in CES. In most cases orthopaedic surgeons are litigated against, and bowel and bladder symptoms remain the most disturbing cause of litigation. These surgeons are mostly not spinal specialists. In most successful cases of litigation there is considerable delay in diagnosis and management. Where there is incomplete Cauda Equina Syndrome urgent or emergency investigation and treatment is mandatory.
Orthopaedic
60
Accident and Emergency
32
Other
25
We have assessed whether an epidural steroid injection is effective in the treatment of symptoms due to compression of a nerve root in the lumbar spine by carrying out a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in which patients received either an epidural steroid injection or an intramuscular injection of local anaesthetic and steroid. We assessed a total of 93 patients according to the Oxford pain chart and the Oswestry disability index and followed up for a minimum of two years. All the patients had been categorised as potential candidates for surgery. There was a significant reduction in pain early on in those having an epidural steroid injection but no difference in the long term between the two groups. The rate of subsequent operation in the groups was similar.
Instability may present at a different level after successful stabilisation of an unstable segment in apparently isolated injuries of the cervical spine. It can give rise to progressive deformity or symptoms which require further treatment. We performed one or more operations for unstable cervical spinal injuries on 121 patients over a period of 90 months. Of these, five were identified as having instability due to an initially unrecognised fracture-subluxation at a different level. We present the details of these five patients and discuss the problems associated with their diagnosis and treatment.
