The Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment
(SMART) programme was introduced in 2008. This paper summarises
the outcome of this programme. Patients with a rupture of the Achilles
tendon treated in our unit follow a comprehensive management protocol
that includes a dedicated Achilles clinic, ultrasound examination,
the use of functional orthoses, early weight-bearing, an accelerated
exercise regime and guidelines for return to work and sport. The
choice of conservative or surgical treatment was based on ultrasound
findings. The rate of re-rupture, the outcome using the Achilles Tendon
Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and the Achilles Tendon Repair Score,
(AS), and the complications were recorded. An elementary cost analysis
was also performed. Between 2008 and 2014 a total of 273 patients presented with
an acute rupture 211 of whom were managed conservatively and 62
had surgical repair. There were three
re-ruptures (1.1%). There were 215 men and 58 women with a mean
age of 46.5 years (20 to 86). Functional outcome was satisfactory.
Mean ATRS and AS at four months was 53.0
( The SMART programme resulted in a low rate of re-rupture, a satisfactory
outcome, a reduced rate of surgical intervention and a reduction
in healthcare costs. Cite this article:
Historically the incidence of Achilles re-ruptures has been described as around 5% after surgical repair and up to 21% after conservative management. In 2008 we commenced a dedicated Achilles tendon rupture clinic for both conservative and surgically managed patients using new standardised operating procedures (SOP). We have evaluated the impact of this new service, particularly with regard to re-rupture rate. The SOP was stage dependent and included an initial ultrasound examination, functional orthotics with early weight bearing, accelerated exercise and guidelines for the return to work and sport. Evaluation included re-rupture rate, complication rate, and outcome measured by the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Achilles Tendon Repair Score (AS). A basic cost evaluation was performed to assess any potential savings.Introduction:
Materials and methods:
We conducted a randomised controlled trial to
determine whether active intense pulsed light (IPL) is an effective treatment
for patients with chronic mid-body Achilles tendinopathy. A total
of 47 patients were randomly assigned to three weekly therapeutic
or placebo IPL treatments. The primary outcome measure was the Victorian
Institute of Sport Assessment – Achilles (VISA-A) score. Secondary
outcomes were a visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and the Lower
Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Outcomes were recorded at baseline,
six weeks and 12 weeks following treatment. Ultrasound assessment
of the thickness of the tendon and neovascularisation were also
recorded before and after treatment. There was no significant difference between the groups for any
of the outcome scores or ultrasound measurements by 12 weeks, showing
no measurable benefit from treatment with IPL in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Cite this article:
Chronic mid body Achilles A systematic review of the literature was conducted. A search of published and grey literature databases was undertaken (1999- December 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for eligibility using a strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. All eligible articles were assessed critically using the Pedro score. Data on cohort characteristics, diagnostic criteria, treatment intervention, outcome measures and results was extracted. A narrative research synthesis method was adopted.Introduction
Methods
The Ponseti regime was introduced in Swansea in 2003 for the treatment of congenital Sixty children (89 feet) were treated with the Ponseti regime between 2003 and 2010. Their notes were compared with notes from 12 children (21 feet) treated between 1995 and 2002. Clinic attendance for serial manipulation and immobilisation (strap/cast) was compared using a two-tailed Mann Whitney U test. Major release surgery was compared using a two-tailed Fisher's Exact test.Introduction
Materials and Methods
