Advances in the management of open tibial fractures have reduced the incidence of long-term complications of these injuries. However, a number of patients continue to suffer from sequelae such as infection, non-union and malunion. Many orthopaedic surgeons believe a below-knee amputation with a well-fitted prosthesis is a better alternative to limb reconstruction surgery. There are few studies that evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of amputees against patients who have undergone limb salvage procedures, and their results are conflicting. The hypothesis of this study is that patients who have undergone limb salvage have as good or better outcomes than those who have had below-knee amputations. This is a retrospective case study. One group (n=12) had been treated with below-knee amputation following a variety of lower limb fractures. The other group (n=11) had developed complications following tibial fractures and undergone limb salvage surgery using the Ilizarov method. The groups were compared by means of a postal questionnaire, comprising the Oswestry Disability Index and the SF-36 Health Survey.Introduction
Methods