Dual Mobility (DM) Total Hip Replacements (THRs), are becoming widely used but function in-vivo is not fully understood.

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of impingement of a modular dual mobility with that of a standard cup.

A geometrical model of one subject's bony anatomy \[1\] was developed, a THR was implanted with the cup at a range of inclination and anteversion positions (Corail® stem, Pinnacle® cup (DePuy Synthes)). Two DM variants and one STD acetabular cup were modelled. Joint motions were taken from kinematic data of activities of daily living associated with dislocation \[2\] and walking. The occurrence of impingement was assessed for each component combination, orientation and activity. Implant-implant impingement can occur between the femoral neck and the metal or PE liner (DM or STD constructs respectively) or neck-PE mobile liner (DM only).

The results comprise a colour coded matrix which sums the number of impingement events for each cup position and activity and for each implant variant.

Neck-PE mobile liner impingement, occurred for both DM sizes, for all activities, and most cup placement positions indicating that the PE mobile liner is likely to move at the start of all activities including walking.

For all constructs no placement positions avoided neck-metal (DM) or neck-PE liner (STD) impingementevents in all activities. The least number of events occurred at higher inclination and anteversion component positions. In addition to implant-implant impingement, some instances of bone-bone and implant-bone impingement were also observed.

Consistent with DM philosophy, neck-PE mobile liner impingement and liner motion occurred for all activities including walking. Neck-liner impingement frequency was comparable between both DM sizes (metal liner) and a standard cup (PE liner).

Dual Mobility (DM) Total Hip Replacements (THRs) were introduced to reduce dislocation risk, which is the most common cause of early revision. The in-vivo mechanics of these implants is not well understood, despite their increased use in both elective and trauma settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively assess retrieved DM polyethylene liners for signs of damage using visual inspection and semi-quantitative geometric assessment techniques.

Retrieved DM liners (n=20) were visually inspected for the presence of seven established modes of polyethylene damage. If embedded debris was identified on the external surface, its material composition was characterised using energy-dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX). Additionally, each liner was geometrically assessed for signs of wear/deformation using a validated methodology.

Visual inspection of the liners revealed that scratching and pitting were the most common damage modes on either surface. Burnishing was observed on 50% and 15% of the internal and external surfaces, respectively. In addition, embedded debris was identified on 25% of the internal and 65% of the external surfaces. EDX analysis of the debris identified several materials including iron, titanium, cobalt-chrome, and tantalum. Geometric analysis demonstrated highly variable damage patterns across the liners.

The results of this study provide insight into the in-vivo mechanics of DM bearings. For example, the results suggest that the internal bearing (i.e., between the head and liner) acts as the primary articulation site for DM-THRs as evidenced by a higher incidence of burnishing and larger, more concentrated regions of penetration across the liners’ internal surfaces. Furthermore, circumferential, and crescent-shaped damage patterns were identified on the articulating surfaces of the liners thus providing evidence that these components can rotate within the acetabular shell with varying degrees of mobility. The mechanics of DM bearings are complex and may be influenced by several factors (e.g., soft tissue fibrosis, patient activities) and thus further investigation is warranted.

Finally, the results of this study suggest that DM liners may be susceptible to ex-vivo surface damage and thus caution is advised when handling and/or assessing these types of components.

Impingement of total hip replacements (THRs) can cause rim damage of polyethylene liners, and lead to dislocation and/or mechanical failure of liner locking mechanisms[1]. Previous work has focussed on the influence of femoral neck profile on impingement without consideration of neck-shaft angle. This study assessed the occurrence of impingement with two different stem designs (Corail standard [135°] and coxa vara [125°]) under different activities with varying acetabular cup orientation (30° to 70° inclination; 0° to 50° anteversion) using a geometric modelling tool.

The tool was created in a computer aided design software programme, and incorporated an individual's hemi-pelvis and femur geometry[3] with a THR (DePuy Synthes Pinnacle^® shell and neutral liner; size 12 Corail^® standard or coxa vara and 32mm head). Kinematic data of activities associated with dislocation[2], such as stooping to pick an object from the floor was applied and incidences of impingement were recorded.

Predicted implant impingement was influenced by stem design. The coxa vara stem was predicted to cause implant impingement less frequently across the range of activities and cup orientations investigated, compared to the standard stem [Fig. 1]. The cup orientations predicted to cause impingement the least frequently were at lower inclination and anteversion angles, relative to the standard stem [Fig. 1]. The coxa vara stem included a collar, while the standard stem was collarless; additional analysis indicated that differences were due to neck angle and not the presence of a collar.

This study demonstrated that stem neck-shaft angle is an important variable in prosthetic impingement in THR and surgeons should be aware of this when choosing implants. Future work will consider further implant design and bone geometry variables. This tool has the potential for use in optimising stem design and position and could assist with patient specific stem selection based on an individual's activity profile.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

The mechanical performance of the cement-in-cement interface in revision surgery has not been fully investigated. The quantitative effect posed by interstitial fluids and roughening of the primary mantle remains unclear. We have analysed the strength of the bilaminar cement-bone interface after exposure of the surface of the primary mantle to roughening and fluid interference. The end surfaces of cylindrical blocks of cement were machined smooth (Ra = 200 nm) or rough (Ra = 5 μm) and exposed to either different volumes of water and carboxymethylcellulose (a bone-marrow equivalent) or left dry. Secondary blocks were cast against the modelled surface. Monoblocks of cement were used as a control group. The porosity of the samples was investigated using micro-CT. Samples were exposed to a single shearing force to failure.

The mean failure load of the monoblock control was 5.63 kN (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.17 to 6.08) with an estimated shear strength of 36 MPa. When small volumes of any fluid or large volumes were used, the respective values fell between 4.66 kN and 4.84 kN with no significant difference irrespective of roughening (p > 0.05). Large volumes of carboxymethylcellulose significantly weakened the interface. Roughening in this group significantly increased the strength with failure loads of 2.80 kN (95% CI 2.37 to 3.21) compared with 0.86 kN (95% CI 0.43 to 1.27) in the smooth variant. Roughening of the primary mantle may not therefore be as crucial as has been previously thought in clinically relevant circumstances.