Taper corrosion and fretting have been associated with oxide layer abrasion and fluid ingress that contributes to adverse local tissue reactions with potential failure of the hip joint replacement^[1,2]. Both mechanisms are considered to be affected by the precise nature of the taper design^[3]. Indeed relative motion at the taper interface that causes fretting damage and wear effects, such as pistoning and rocking, have been described following analysis of implants at retrieval^[4,5]. However, there is much less reported about the mechanisms that allow the fluid ingress/egress at the taper interface which would drive corrosion. Thus the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of trunnion design on the gap opening and taper relative motions under different load scenarios and taper designs.

A 3-D finite element model of a 40mm CoCr modular femoral head and a Ti6Al4V trunnion was established in Abaqus CAE/2018. Femoral head and trunnion geometries were meshed with an element (C3D8) size of 0.17mm. Tapers were assembled by simulating a range of impact forces (AF); taper interface behaviour was evaluated under physiological forces and frictional moments simulated during walking activity^[6], assuming different coefficients of friction (CF), Figure 1. The output involved the total and normal relative motion of the surfaces at the taper interface.

The model predicted for a taper mismatch of 0.36° which, when combined with an assembly force of 2kN, generated the largest taper gap opening (59.2mm) during walking, Figure 2. In all trunnion designs the largest normal relative motion coincided with heel strike in the gait cycle (0–5%). The taper gap and normal relative motions were related to the initial taper lock area. Furthermore, the direction of the total motion was different in all three taper mismatches, with a shift in the direction towards the normal of the surface as the taper mismatch increased, Figure 3. By contrast, the direction of the normal relative motions did not change with different trunnion designs. Contact patterns were asymmetrical and contact areas varied throughout the walking activity; contact pressure and the largest taper gap were located on the same side of the taper, suggesting toggling of the trunnion.

The relationship between taper gap opening and initial taper lock contact area suggests that the taper contact area functions as a fulcrum in a lever mechanism. Large taper mismatches create larger relative motions that will not only create more wear and fretting damage but also larger normal relative motions. This may allow fluid ingress into the taper interface and/or the egress of fluid along with any metal wear particles into the body. This increased understanding of the taper motion will result in improved designs and ultimately taper performance.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.