Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries. This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.Aims
Methods
The Pronator Quadratus (PQ) is commonly damaged in the surgical approach to the distal radius during volar plating. This study explored the functional strength of the PQ muscle, 12 months after volar plating of a distal radial fracture. Testing of treated and contralateral forearms was carried out using a custom-made Torque Measuring Device (TMD) and surface Electromyography (sEMG). To assess both the direct and indirect function of PQ in participants treated with volar plating and compared to the contralateral non-injured forearms. The angle of elbow flexion was varied from 45o, 90o and 135o when measuring forearm pronation. Mean peak torque of the major pronating muscles, PQ and Pronator Teres (PT) was directly measured with the TMD and the indirect activation of the PQ and PT was measured with sEMG. In total 27 participants were studied. A statistically significant reduction in mean peak pronation torque was observed in the volar plated forearms (P<0.05 SE 0.015, CI 95%). This is unlikely to be of clinical significance as the mean reduction was small (13.43Nm treated v 13.48Nm none treated). Pairwise comparison found no statistically significant reduction in peak torque between 45o, 90o and 135o of elbow flexion. There was an increase in PQ muscle activation at 135o compared to 45o elbow flexion. The converse was identified in PT. The small but statistically significant difference in mean peak torque in treated and uninjured forearms is unlikely to be of clinical significance and results suggest adequate functional recovery of the PQ after volar plating.
There is limited evidence assessing the effect of the Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) on gait improvements in diplegic cerebral palsy. In particular, the effect of the AFO on vertical forces during gait has not been reported. Appropriate vertical ground reaction forces are crucial in enabling children with CP to walk efficiently. This study investigated the effect of AFO application on the vertical forces in gait, particularly the second vertical peak in force (FZ2) in late stance. The force data was compared with the barefoot walk. A retrospective analysis of nineteen children (8M,11F) who met inclusion criteria of a diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP, ability to walk independently barefoot and also using bilateral rigid AFOs were included. Gait data were acquired using the Vicon-Nexus ® motion-capture. Resulting ground reaction force data were recorded. Appropriate statistical methods assessed significance between barefoot and AFO dataIntroduction
Patients and Methods
Two knee arthroplasty implants with very different design principles were previously available in our region. Kinemax is PCL retaining with a fixed bearing and cemented components. LCS is PCL sacrificing, fully uncemented and incorporates a rotating bearing. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of these two radically different knee designs. Between 1994 and 2004, 300 consecutive patients were recruited and underwent a knee replacement performed by the senior author. Each patient was randomised via sealed envelopes to receive either LCS or Kinemax implants. All patients were followed up by an audit nurse and patient satisfaction and Knee Society Scores (KSSs) were recorded. By 2012, 135 patients had complete data at a minimum of 10-years of follow-up. The remaining 165 had either died before 10-year review or had not reached the 10-year mark. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were 69 patients in the Kinemax group and 68 in the LCS group. The pre-operative demographics were not significantly different between the two groups. At 10-years of follow-up, each implant design demonstrated significant improvements in the KSS (p=0.001 kinemax, p=0.001 LCS) over pre-operative values. No significant difference could be identified between the two designs at 10 years. There were only two revisions in the whole study population and both were for kinemax implants at less than five years post-operatively. In conclusion, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the two radically different knee designs at ten years with both designs performing equally well.
