Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis for lesser toe deformity is commonly stabilised using a Kirschner wire passed through the tip of the toe. Recently, a number of all-inside intramedullary fusion devices have been developed, with the aim of decreasing infection risk through avoiding exposed metalwork. We report our early experience with Stayfuse™ (Nexa Orthopaedics).

Case records of patients undergoing Stayfuse™ proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis between July 2009 and November 2011 were examined. Twenty-eight Stayfuse™ proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis procedures in 14 patients were performed. Overall, 8 (29%) procedures required revision within 6 months. Of these, 3 (11%) intraoperative failures occurred, requiring immediate revision (Kirschner wire stabilisation or excision arthroplasty). All involved bending failure of the implant clip mechanism. A further 5 (18%) toes required revision procedures within 6 months of the index procedure, 3 (11%) for dissociation of the implant clip mechanism and 2 (7%) for periprosthetic fracture.

For patients perceived to be at higher risk of infective complications, all-inside stabilisation systems are an attractive concept. However, with 29% of patients undergoing revision procedures within 6 months, we question the safety of choosing Stayfuse™ implants over Kirschner wire stabilisation.

Background

During cephalomedullary nail stabilisation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures, damage to the distal anterior femoral cortex by the nail is a recognised cause of periprosthetic fracture. Currently available cephalomedullary devices vary widely in anteroposterior curvature, though all are less curved than the mean anatomic human femur. This study tests the hypothesis that a cephalomedullary device with greater anteroposterior curvature will achieve a more favourable position in the distal femur, with greater distance of the nail tip from the anterior cortex, and therefore lower risk of cortical damage.