Leucocyte esterase (LE) has been shown to be an accurate marker of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and has been proposed as an alternative to frozen section (FS) histology for intraoperative diagnosis. In this study, the intraoperative assessment of LE was compared with FS histology for the diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection. A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) between June 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. There were 56 men and 63 women with a mean age of 66.2 years (27 to 88). Synovial fluid was collected before arthrotomy for the assessment of LE using enzymatic colourimetric strips. Between five and six samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for FS histology, and considered suggestive of infection when at least five polymorphonuclear leucocytes were found in five high-power fields.Aims
Patients and Methods
Leukocyte esterase (LE) has shown to be an accurate marker of prosthetic joint infections and has been proposed as an alternative to frozen section (FS) for intra-operative diagnosis. In this study, intra-operative determination of LE was compared with FS for the diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections. One hundred and nineteen patients undergoing hip revision surgery due to prosthetic joint failure from June 2015 to December 2017 were considered. Joint fluids were collected before the arthrotomy for determination of LE which was performed by using enzymatic colorimetric strips. Four to six samples were stained with hematoxylin eosin for FS and considered suggestive for infection when at least 5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes in 5 fields at high power fields were found. Sensitivity and specificity of LE were 100% and 93.8 %, respectively. The positive predictive value was 79.3 %, while the negative predictive value was 100%. Time from collection to response was 20.1 ± 4.4 minutes. Sensitivity and specificity of FS were 83.3 % and 92.1 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.6 % and 97.1%. Time from sample collection response was 27.2 ± 6.9 minutes. LE showed a higher sensitivity and a slightly lower specificity and the same diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative FS. The faster turnaround time (about 20 minutes from receiving of sample by the laboratory), its ease of use and the low costs make this test a valuable alternative to frozen sections and is going to replace FS in our clinical practice.
