We present a retrospective study of comparision between two types of aritifical boen graft substitues. There is an overwhelming marketting drive on part of companies to sell alternative bone grafts/BMP. We in this study compae two such producsts and their cost effectiveness

This is an interventional, retrospective, non consecutive, non randamised case series study of 27 patients. Type I bone graft is Mini MIIG which is surgical grade calciun sulphate which is osteoconductive. Type II bone graft is Allomatrix which conatins bone marrow aspirate, bone morphogenic protein, concellous bone chips and surgical grade calciun sulphate which is osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive. In this study 14 cases were treated with Mini MIIG and 18 with Allomatrix. There were 24 primary fractures with bone defect, 2 non union and 1 delayed union. Complete bony union were seen in all 27 patients. Average time to heal since bone grafting is 3 months. Complications are extrubent callus formation, bone formatiom in soft tissue, but no patient required secondary procedure to trim the bone. Cost for Allomatrix is £ 356.00 and Mini MIIG is £348.00. Use of such artificial bone grafting avoids the complication of autografting which includes bone graft side morbidity like pain, bleeding and neurvascular damage. For fresh fractures useage of such artificial bone grafts doesnt shorten the healing time, doesnt prevent collapse at fracture site and it is not cost effective. For non union and delyaed unions it avoids the cost for artifical bone grafting. But autograft also incurs the cost of removing, theatre timing. human resources cost and hospital inpatient costs. There is no difference between one type of bone graft over the other and for fresh fracture both of them has no advantage over using no bone grafts.

Our study concludes artifical bone graft is of no advantage for fresh fractures and for non union and delayed unions it is too small a number to come to any conclusion.