Within hours after exposure to hypoxic circumstances hMSCs start producing AGFs. Initially hypoxia does not affect hMSC proliferation and metabolic activity, but after 7 days both are decreased, compared to hMSCs cultured under ambient oxygen conditions. At the moment of implantation of a large cell seeded scaffold, usually a vascular network is lacking within the scaffold. Therefore, the cells seeded on the scaffold are exposed to hypoxic circumstances. Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) exposed to hypoxic circumstances, start to produce angiogenic factors (AGF)1 and to proliferate faster than at ambient oxygen levels2. Under severe, continued hypoxia, hMSC metabolism slows down and ultimately stops3. We hypothesise that there is a threshold oxygen level above which hMSCs at hypoxia will both produce AGF and still proliferate, and below which cells slow down their metabolism. If hMSCs are provided with oxygen levels just above this threshold, effective tissue regeneration, which requires cell proliferation and vascular ingrowth, may be accomplished.Summary
Introduction
A transverse force system, consisting of an anterior progression force counteracted by a posterior force and torque, acts on the vertebrae of a scoliotic spine. The aim of the newly introduced TriaC brace is to reverse this transverse force pattern by externally applied and constantly present orthotic forces. In the frontal plane the force system is in accordance with the conventional braces. However, in the sagittal plane the force system acts only in the thoracic region. As a result, there is no pelvic tilt, and it provides flexibility without affecting the correction forces during body motion.
The new brace prevented further progression of the scoliotic curves, except for seven patients, who required surgery. The initial mean Cobb angle before brace treatment, was 26,5 degrees, the mean lateral displacement at the apex 18,5 millimetres, and the initial axial rotation of the apex was 12,3 degrees. Analysis of differences between each successive visit showed that the difference was not statistically significant for the Cobb angle (p=0,71), nor for the other parameters.
We have measured the increase in height and width of the vertebral bodies and expressed them as percentages of the total growth in children aged 10 to 17 years. The first group, 10 boys and 10 girls, each had a single thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis while the second group, 10 girls, each had a single lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. No significant differences were found between the growth increments and spinal dimensions of the vertebral bodies involved in the scoliotic curve and those vertebrae outside the curve in the same patient. The vertebrae were more slender in girls than in boys.