The primary aim of multidisciplinary management of diabetic foot disease is limb savage. Difficulty in eradication of infection with systemic antibiotics and obliteration of dead space created by debridement, are two major stumbling blocks in achieving this. Antibiotic loaded bio composites help achieve both these objectives. The aim of this study is to report the early results of antibiotic loaded bio composites in diabetic foot disease We present early results of 16 patients with diabetic foot disease and osteomyelitis in whom we used antibiotic loaded bio composite (CERAMENT G Bone Support, Lund, Sweden) for local antibiotic delivery and dead space eradication. A multidisciplinary team managed all patients. We performed magnetic resonance and vascular imaging preoperatively and adhered to a strict protocol involving debridement, culture specific systemic antibiotics and dead space obliteration with antibiotic loaded bio composite. The wound was managed with negative pressure wound therapy and all patients were kept non-weight bearing with a plaster back slab or walking boot. Skin cover where required was undertaken by our plastic surgeons.Aim
Method
The mid foot joints are usually the first to be affected in Charcot neuroarthropathy(CN). Reconstruction is technically demanding and fraught with complications. Fixation methods have evolved over time from cancellous screws, plates, bolts and a combination of these. We present our experience of mid foot fusion in CN from a tertiary diabetic foot centre. In this series we undertook mid foot corrective fusion in 27 feet (25patients) and are presenting the results of those with a minimumof six months follow up. Twelve of these had concurrent hindfoot fusion. Eleven patients had type 1 diabetes, 12 had type 2 and 2 were non-diabetics. 23 patients were ASA grade3 and 2 were ASA 2. 21 feet had ulcers preoperatively and mean HbA1c was 8.2. 13 patients had diabetic retinopathy and 6 had nephropathy. Average patient age was 59 (43 to 80) and our mean follow up was 35 months (7 to 67). One patient was lost to follow up and 2 patients died. 18 patients had plates, 3 had bolts and 6 had a combination. Complete follow up data was available for 26 feet in 24 patients. Satisfactory correction of deformity was achieved in all patients. The mean correction of calcaneal pitch was from 0.6 preoperatively to 10.6 degrees postoperatively, mean Meary angle from 22 to 9 degrees, talo- metatarsal angle on AP view from 33 to 13 degree. Bony union was achieved in 21 out of 26 feet and atleast one joint failed to fuse in 5. 19 out of 24 patients were able to mobilize fully or partially weight bearing. We had 6 patients with persisting and 3 withrecurrent ulceration. Seven repeat procedures were carried out which included 2 revision fixations. 4 out of 5 non-unions were seen where bolts were used alone or supplemented with plates. With our technique and a strict protocol 100% limb salvage and 81% union was achieved. 80% patients were mobile and ulcer healing was achieved in 72%. Corrective mid foot fusion is an effective procedure in these complex casesbut require the input of a multidisciplinary team for perioperative care.
Handgrip dynamometry has previously been used to detect pre - operative malnutrition and predict the likelihood of post - operative complications. This study explored whether a relationship exists between pre-operative pinch and power grip strength and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. We investigated whether handgrip dynamometry could be used pre - operatively to identify patients at greater risk of longer inpatient stays. 164 patients (64 male, 100 female) due to undergo lower limb arthroplasty (83 Total Knee Replacement, 81 Total Hip Replacement) were assessed in pre - admission clinic. Average measurements of pinch grip and power grip were taken from each patient using the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer (Jamar, USA). Duration of each inpatient stay was recorded. Patients with painful or disabling conditions involving the upper limb were excluded. Other clinical variables such as age and ASA grade were investigated as potential confounders of the relationship of interest and adjusted for.Purpose
Methods
Large studies have reported high dislocation rates (7 to 24%) following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly when the revision is undertaken in the presence of pre-existing instability. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcome of 155 consecutive revision THA's that had been performed using an unconstrained dual-mobility acetabular implant. It features a mobile polyethylene liner articulating with both the prosthesis head and a metal acetabular cup, such that the liner acts as the femoral head in extreme positions. It can be implanted in either a press fit or cemented manner. Mean follow-up was 40 months (18–66) and average age 77 (42–89). Uncemented (n=122) and cemented (n=33) implants with a reinforcing cage, were used. Indications were aseptic loosening (n=113), recurrent instability (n=29), periprosthetic fracture (n=11) and sepsis (n=2). Three of the 155 cases (1.9%) dislocated within 6 weeks of surgery and were successfully managed with closed reduction. The 3 dislocations occurred in the groups revised for recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. There were no cases of recurrent dislocation and no revisions for implant failure. Despite a pantheon of options available, post-operative dislocation remains a challenge especially in patients with risk factors for instability. The use of large diameter heads is proven to improve stability but there are concerns regarding wear rates, metal toxicity and recurrent dislocation in the presence of abductor dysfunction. With constrained liners there are concerns regarding device failure and aseptic loosening due to implant overload. Our dislocation rates of 1.9% and survivorship to date compare favourably with alternative techniques and are also in line with studies from France using implants of a similar design. In our hands, where there are risk factors for dislocation, the use of a dual-mobility implant has been very effective at both restoring and maintaining stability in patients undergoing revision THA.
