This study compares the endoscopic carpal tunnel release with the conventional open technique with respect to short and long-term improvements of functional and clinical outcomes. We assessed 72 outpatients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Thirty-seven patients underwent the endoscopic method according to Chow and 35 were assigned to the open method. Improvement in symptoms, severity and functionality were evaluated shortly preoperatively (at two days, one week and two weeks) and one year after using the Symptom Severity Scale, Symptom Severity Status and DASH questionnaire. Changes in clinical outcomes (grip strength, key pinch and two-point discrimination test) were evaluated one year postoperatively. Complications were also assessed. Both groups showed similar improvement in all but one outcome one year after the release; increase in grip strength was significantly higher for the endoscopic group. The endoscopic method was also associated with a significantly faster short-term improvement. Separate analysis of the questionnaire components referring to pain reveals that the delay of improvement in the open group is due to the persistence of pain for a longer period. Paresthesias and numbness decrease shortly after the operation with comparable rates for both groups.
Since 1987, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been performed in Gothenburg, Sweden in more than 1600 patients. Out of the first 442 patients operated with ACI, 153 (35%) had patella lesions and 91 (21%) had trochlea lesions. Forty two patients (9.5%) had kissing lesions of the patellofemoral joint. The aim of the study was to evaluate the current clinical status of operated patients. Lysholm and Tegner-Wallgren self-assessment questionnaires were used. The patients were requested to compare their current status to previous states and to report whether they would do the operation again. Concomitant realignment procedures of the patellofemoral joint were also recorded and preoperative scores were also assessed from the medical files. Patients were divided into groups according to the location of lesion. All the groups showed a significant improvement compared with the preoperative assessment. Over 90% of the treated patients were satisfied with the ACI and would have undergone the procedure again. It seems that correcting the coexisting background factors with realignment, stabilizing or unloading procedures is improving the results over time. Despite the initial controversy about the results and indication for ACI in patellofemoral lesions, it is clear that ACI provides a satisfactory result even for the difficult cases with concomitant patellar instability. Our study reveals preservation of the good results and of high level of patients’ activities, even 10 to 20 years after the implantation.