Multiple joint registries have reported better implant survival for patients aged >75 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cemented implant combinations when compared to hybrid or uncemented implant combinations. However, there is considerable variation within these broad implant categories, and it has therefore been suggested that specific implant combinations should be compared. We analysed the most common contemporary uncemented (Corail/Pinnacle), hybrid (Exeter V40/Trident) and cemented (Exeter V40/Exeter X3) implant combinations in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) for patients aged >75 years. All THAs performed using the selected implants in the NZJR for patients aged >75 years between 1999 and 2018 were included. Demographic data, implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the NZJR, and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were recorded. 5427 THAs were included. There were 1105 implantations in the uncemented implant combination group, 3040 in the hybrid implant combination group and 1282 in the cemented implant combination group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the cemented implant combination (0.31 revisions/100 component years) and the hybrid implant combination (0.40 revisions/100 component years) but were statistically significantly higher in the uncemented implant combination (0.80/100 component years). Femoral-sided revisions were significantly greater in the uncemented implant combination group. The cemented implant and hybrid implant combinations provide equivalent survival and functional outcomes in patients aged over 75 years. Caution is advised if considering use of the uncemented implant combination in this age group, predominantly due to a higher risk of femoral sided revisions. The authors recommend comparison of individual implants rather than broad categories of implants.
Positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty has profound effects on the biomechanics, stability and wear of the prosthesis. Normal anatomical position in females is 57 degrees (50 – 67 degrees) inclination with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) of anteversion, whilst in males 56 degrees of inclination (48 – 66 degrees) with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) is normal. In total hip arthroplasty, inclination recommendation ranges from 30 – 50 degrees. The aim of this study was to radiographically measure acetabular component position in total hip arthroplasty and compare to normal values. The Widmer method was used by two independent observers to radiographically measure inclination in 522 patients using standard AP radiographs. Primary measures and variables were statistically analysed as was inter and intra observer reliability. All patients included within the study received total hip arthroplasty for age related degenerative changes to the hip. Operations were undertaken by 17 separate consultants or senior registrars under their care.Background
Method
After 2 fatalities from this condition at our institution in 2005, a retrospective review of elective surgical records from the previous five years was undertaken and we established 16 further non-fatal cases of Ogilvie’s Syndrome. (This work was presented as a poster at the Christchurch NZOA 2005). We have since prospectively recorded any occurrence of Ogilvie’s Syndrome after elective orthopaedic surgery. Over the last 2 years since the previous report, we have identified a further 8 cases of Ogilvie’s Syndrome, with one further fatality. This little-known condition is far more prevalent than thought, and is often not diagnosed despite severe consequences. All surgeons should be aware of this condition. Early recognition and intervention is critical to patient survival. Hallmarks of the clinical presentation will be discussed, along with acute management guidelines.
The aim of this study was to determine the inter and intra observer reliability of ultrasound measurements in treated unstable neonatal hips and whether ultrasound measurements correlate with radiological outcome at 6 months. Sixty-four babies treated from birth with a Pavlik harness for neonatal hip instability were scanned at 2 and 6 weeks. The α and β angles of Graf, the combined (H) angle of Hosny and the femoral head coverage (FHC) were measured by 3 observers and inter-observer and intra-observer repeatability co-efficients calculated using 95% confidence limits. Hips were categorized as normal, abnormal or borderline for each parameter and Kappa values calculated. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to assess any relationship between ultrasound measurements at 2 or 6 weeks and outcome as determined by acetabular index at 6 months. Seven hundred and ninety two sets of measurements were made from 248 scans. The α angle had the smallest interobserver range (17°), the H angle range was 21°and the β angle 28°. Kappa values showed good agreement for FHC and β angle. The mean acetabular index of all hips at 6 months was 26° (sd 4.9). The acetabular index was 30° or greater in 24 hips (18 babies) despite prolonged splintage in 9 hips (6 babies). The FHC at 6 weeks was predictive of acetabular index at 6 months (regression coefficient −0.27, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.12, p<
0.001) We recommend the FHC as being reproducible, useful and predictive of outcome in neonatal hips treated for instability.
The aim was to compare the initial pull out strengths of various interference screw devices used for tibial fixation of hamstring grafts and the effect of concentric or eccentric screw position. Quadrupled tendon grafts were harvested from freshly killed sheep. The grafts were then prepared and fixed in the distal femur using various devices (Intrafix, RCI screw, Wedge screw +/− transfix pin, screw and post) in both concentric and eccentric positions. A single load to failure test was then performed. The highest pull out strength was with the Intrafix device inserted concentrically (mean 941N). This was significantly higher than the wedge screw inserted concentrically (737N) (p=0.015). This in turn had significantly greater initial pull out strength than the wedge eccentric with post or pin (p=0.03) and the RCI screw (464N) (p=0.00036). In this sheep model the Intrafix device inserted concentrically had a significantly greater initial pull-out strength than the other interference screws tested. Concentric positioning of an interference screw gave significantly greater initial pullout strength of a quadruple hamstring graft than eccentric positioning. Addition of a cross pin or post made no difference to initial pullout strength.
We present two cases of Ogilvie’s syndrome and to raise awareness of this rare but serious complication.
We report on two recent cases of Ogilvie’s Syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction) with subsequent caecal perforation after THJR. Case 1: A 49 year old woman underwent THJR for osteoarthritis. Postoperatively developed abdominal pain and distension. Underwent laparotomy for a perforated caecum 10 days following THJR. Died 24 hours later. Case 2: A 73 year old man underwent a revision THJR. Postoperatively developed a distended abdomen. Underwent laparotomy and caecostomy 10 days after THJR. Discharged 29 days after admission. Both cases had GA and spinal anaesthetics with intrathecal Morphine. Both failed to settle with conservative treatment. There was no mechanical obstruction in either case. Audit figures showed 21 other cases of non-mechanical bowel obstruction after hip or knee arthroplasty. Ogilvie’s Syndrome is a rare “malignant” form of postoperative pseudo-obstruction characterised by massive dilatation of the large bowel which, if untreated, results in caecal perforation. It is rare following joint arthroplasty but if occurs has a high morbidity and mortality. Prompt recognition of the presenting features by orthopaedic surgeons with expedient general surgical intervention is necessary to avoid potentially fatal consequences.
The aim of this surgery was to determine current practice amongst orthopaedic surgeons in New Zealand with regard to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. All current members of the NZOA were sent a questionnaire on the numbers and proportions of grafts performed, methods of fixation, operative technique and return to sport. One hundred and ten of 140 questionnaires were returned completed. Ninety two orthopaedic surgeons were performing ACL reconstructions. Eight per cent performed patellar tendon grafts in preference to hamstring grafts, whereas 16% preferred hamstring over patellar tendon grafts. Almost 2000 patellar tendon grafts at an average of just over 20 per surgeon are performed each year compared to just over 500 hamstring grafts at an average of just over 15 per surgeon. Metal interference screws were the most common fixation device in patellar tendon and hamstring grafts. Patellar tendon grafts are the most common grafts used for ACL reconstruction with 80 % of those surveyed preferring to use patellar tendon over hamstring grafts. Metal interference screws were the most common fixation device. There is reasonable consensus regarding return to activity and sport.
The purpose of this study was to audit screening and treatment programmes for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) over a 12-year period from 1989 to 2000 with respect to late presentation and treatment rate and duration. All babies born in Queen Mary Hospital are clinically screened for DDH by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Unstable hips are treated by Pavlik Harness and attend an ultrasound clinic run by an orthopaedic surgeon within 2 weeks. High-risk babies or those with suspected instability can also be referred for ultrasound. Serial ultrasound exams assisted with determining the duration of splintage. Radiographs are taken at 4 to 6 months. Late presenters were identified and analysed. Over the 12-year period 13 cases of late presenting DDH were identified (0.6 per 1000). Half of these had not been screened. None had ultrasound screening. Our treatment rate was approximately 4 per 1000 live births. Our screening programme can be improved by increased capture of patients for clinical screening. Ultrasound is a useful tool in managing neonatal hip instability allowing duration of splintage to be tailored to the individual and allows early detection of treatment failure.
