To evaluate early mobilization with the ‘STRONG regime’ is safe after lateral ankle ligament repair with suture tape augmentation. The ESSKA-AFAS ankle instability group presented in 2016 evidence-based guidelines for rehabilitation and return to activity after lateral ankle ligament repair. Early mobilization is considered an important element of postoperative rehabilitation. Patients have to be immobilized for approximately six weeks to protect the delicate repair. Lateral ankle ligament repair with suture tape augmentation results in greater strength compared with standard repairs and early mobilization proved to be successful in small sample size studies. Augmented surgery technique is getting increasingly popular. However, it is unknown which rehabilitation regimes are used. It is essential to establish a clear evidence-based guideline for rehabilitation after surgery.Objective
Background
Knee swelling is common after injury or surgery, resulting in pain, restricted range of movement and limited mobility. Accurately measuring knee swelling is critical to assess recovery. However, current measurement methods are either unreliable or expensive [1,2]. Therefore, a new measurement method is developed. This wearable (the ‘smart brace’) has shown the ability to distinguish a swollen knee from a not swollen knee using multi-frequency-bio impedance analysis (MF-BIA) [3]. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of this smart brace. The study involved 25 usable measurements on patients treated for unilateral knee osteoartritis with a 5mL injection of Lidocaïne + DepoMedrol (1:4). MF-BIA measurements were taken before and after the injection, both on the treated and untreated knee. The smart brace accurately measured the effect of the injection by a decrease in resistance of up to 2.6% at 100kHz (p<0.01), where commonly used gel electrodes were unable to measure the relative difference. Remarkably, both the smart brace and gel electrodes showed a time component in the MF-BIA measurements. To further investigate this time component, 10 participants were asked to lie down for 30 minutes, with measurements taken every 3 minutes using both gel electrodes and the smart brace on both legs. The relative change between each time step was calculated to determine changes over time. The results showed presence of a physiological aspect (settling of knee fluids), and for the brace also a mechanical aspect (skin-electrode interface) [4]. The mechanical aspect mainly interfered with reactance values. Overall, the smart brace is a feasible method for quantitatively measuring knee swelling as a relative change over time. However, the skin-electrode interface should be improved for reliable measurements at different moments in time. The findings suggest that the smart brace could be a promising tool for monitoring knee swelling during rehabilitation.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming more powerful but is barely used to counter the growth in health care burden. AI applications to increase efficiency in orthopedics are rare. We questioned if (1) we could train machine learning (ML) algorithms, based on answers from digitalized history taking questionnaires, to predict treatment of hip osteoartritis (either conservative or surgical); (2) such an algorithm could streamline clinical consultation. Multiple ML models were trained on 600 annotated (80% training, 20% test) digital history taking questionnaires, acquired before consultation. Best performing models, based on balanced accuracy and optimized automated hyperparameter tuning, were build into our daily clinical orthopedic practice. Fifty patients with hip complaints (>45 years) were prospectively predicted and planned (partly blinded, partly unblinded) for consultation with the physician assistant (conservative) or orthopedic surgeon (operative). Tailored patient information based on the prediction was automatically sent to a smartphone app. Level of evidence: IV. Random Forest and BernoulliNB were the most accurate ML models (0.75 balanced accuracy). Treatment prediction was correct in 45 out of 50 consultations (90%), p<0.0001 (sign and binomial test). Specialized consultations where conservatively predicted patients were seen by the physician assistant and surgical patients by the orthopedic surgeon were highly appreciated and effective. Treatment strategy of hip osteoartritis based on answers from digital history taking questionnaires was accurately predicted before patients entered the hospital. This can make outpatient consultation scheduling more efficient and tailor pre-consultation patient education.
National Joint Replacement Registries, which are important sources for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) data, report an average PJI incidence ranging from 0.5 to 2.0%. Unfortunately, national registries including the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), are not specifically designed to register PJI. In the Netherlands, the LROI is a nationwide population-based registry with an overall completeness of more than 95%.3 To ensure usability and reliability of PJI data from the LROI, it is important to evaluate the quality and completeness of these data. From 2013 onwards, eight hospitals in the South-East of the Netherlands, collected their PJI data in a detailed regional infection cohort (RIC), specifically designed for this purpose. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and completeness of PJI registration (hip and knee arthroplasty) in the LROI, by comparing the LROI with the RIC. All patients registered with an acute PJI in the RIC between 2014–2018 were selected for the study and were matched with the LROI. According to the Workgroup of American Musculoskeletal Infections Society (MSIS), an acute PJI was defined as at least two phenotypically identical pathogens, isolated in cultures from at least two separate tissues, obtained from the affected peri-prosthetic tissue during the DAIR treatment (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention). Only PJI occurring within 90 days after primary hip or knee arthroplasty were included. The LROI data and completeness was based on the entered procedures and documented reason for revision infection, which was not specially based on the MSIS criteria. After checks on missing and incorrectly data, the completeness of registration in the LROI was calculated by comparing the number of registrations in the LROI with data from the RIC (gold standard).Aim
Method
3D measurement of joint angles so far has only been possible using marker-based movement analysis, and therefore has not been applied in (larger scale) clinical practice (performance test) and even less so in the free field (activity monitoring). 3D joint angles could provide useful additional information in assessing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury using a vertical drop jump or in assessing knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. We developed a tool to measure dynamic 3D joint angles using 6 inertial sensors, attached to left and right shank, thigh and pelvis. The same sensors have been used for activity identification in a previous study. To validate the setup in a pilot study, we measured 3D knee and hip angles using the sensors and a Vicon movement lab simultaneously in 3 subjects. Subjects performed drop jumps, squats and ran on the spot. The mean error between Vicon and sensor measurement for the maximum joint angles was 3, 7 and 8 degrees for knee flexion, ad/abduction and rotation respectively, and 9, 7 and 10 degrees for hip flexion, ad/abduction and rotation respectively. No calibration movements were required. A major part of the inaccuracy was caused by soft tissue effects and can partly be resolved by improved sensor attachment. These pilot results show that it is feasible to measure 3D joint angles continuously using unobtrusive light-weight sensors. No movement lab is necessary and therefore the measurements can be done in a free field setting, e.g. at home or during training at a sport club. A more extensive validation study will be performed in the near future.
We wished to compare the clinical outcome, as assessed by questionnaires
and the rate of complications, in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
undertaken with patient-matched positioning guides (PMPGs) or conventional
instruments. A total of 180 patients (74 men, 106 women; mean age 67 years)
were included in a multicentre, adequately powered, double-blind,
randomised controlled trial. The mean follow-up was 44 months (24
to 57).Aims
Patients and Methods
In order to prevent dislocation of the hip after total hip arthroplasty
(THA), patients have to adhere to precautions in the early post-operative
period. The hypothesis of this study was that a protocol with minimal
precautions after primary THA using the posterolateral approach
would not increase the short-term (less than three months) risk
of dislocation. We prospectively monitored a group of unselected patients undergoing
primary THA managed with standard precautions (n = 109, median age
68.9 years; interquartile range (IQR) 61.2 to 77.3) and a group
who were managed with fewer precautions (n = 108, median age 67.2
years; IQR 59.8 to 73.2). There were no significant differences between
the groups in relation to predisposing risk factors. The diameter
of the femoral head ranged from 28 mm to 36 mm; meticulous soft-tissue
repair was undertaken in all patients. The medical records were
reviewed and all patients were contacted three months post-operatively
to confirm whether they had experienced a dislocation. Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to establish the natural
course of unrevised asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal
(MoM) hip resurfacing during a six- to 12-month follow-up period.
We used repeated metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS)-magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), serum metal ion analysis and clinical examination to
study 14 unrevised hips (mean patient age 52.7 years, 46 to 68,
5 female, 7 male) with a pseudotumour and 23 hips (mean patient
age 52.8 years, 38 to 69, 7 female, 16 male) without a pseudotumour.
The mean post-operative time to the first MARS-MRI scan was 4.3 years
(2.2 to 8.3), and mean time between the first and second MARS-MRI scan
was eight months (6 to 12). At the second MRI scan, the grade of
severity of the pseudotumour had not changed in 35 hips. One new
pseudotumour (Anderson C2 score, moderate) was observed, and one
pseudotumour was downgraded from C2 (moderate) to C1 (mild). In
general, the characteristics of the pseudotumours hardly changed. Repeated MARS-MRI scans within one year in patients with asymptomatic
pseudotumours after MoM hip resurfacing showed little or no variation.
In 23 patients without pseudotumour, one new asymptomatic pseudotumour
was detected. This is the first longitudinal study on the natural history of
pseudotumours using MARS-MRI scans in hip resurfacing, and mirrors
recent results for 28 mm diameter MoM total hip replacement. Cite this article:
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has seen a recent revival with third generation Metal-on-Metal prostheses and is now widely in use. However, safety and effectiveness of hip resurfacing are still questioned. We systematically reviewed peer-reviewed literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty to evaluate implant survival and functional outcomes of hybrid Metal-on-Metal hip resurfacing Arthroplasty. Electronic databases and reference lists were searched from 1988 to September 2009. Identified abstracts were checked for inclusion or exclusion by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted and summarized by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Main study endpoint was implant survival, which we compared with the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark. We also evaluated radiological and functional outcomes, failure modes and other adverse events.Introduction
Method
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has seen a recent revival with third generation Metal-on-Metal prostheses and is now widely in use. However, safety and effectiveness of hip resurfacing are still questioned. We systematically reviewed peer-reviewed literature on hip resurfacing arthroplasty to address these issues. To evaluate implant survival and functional outcomes of hybrid Metal-on-Metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA).Background
Objective
Cementless Total Hip Replacement surgery is a well established procedure for relative young patients with severe hip disease. Excellent long term clinical results have been published on the performance of the femoral component. With growing clinical experience, our concern focused on excessive wear of the Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) ringloc liner of the Mallory Head cementless Total Hip Prosthesis. After its introduction in our clinic in 1997, this implant is still in use without any modification. We were concerned that due to premature liner wear, the performance of this implant would not be compliant with the international guideline on implant survival (NICE guidelines: at 10 year follow up, 90% of all implants should still be in situ). Our objective was to establish the amount of liner wear in our first 200 MH implants. Our first 200 patients consecutively treated with Mallory Head prostheses were followed up to obtain a recent digital image. Follow up was complete for 181 (90.5%) of our 200 patients. Ten had died and nine were not able or willing to come for follow up. The mean duration of follow up was 8.3 years (range: 8–13). The 181 recent digital images were classified as either excessive wear or no excessive wear by two independent orthopedic surgeons. Next, liner wear was measured in the 2D frontal plane using PolyWare Pro/3D Digital Version Rev 5.1 software (Draftware Developers, Conway, USA). A threshold for excessive liner wear was set at 0.2mm/year, according to literature.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to relate the survival of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty devices to a National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark for choosing a primary total hip replacement, which is a survival rate of 90% at a follow-up of ten years. A total of 29 articles (10 621 resurfaced hips) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 10.5 years and the survival of the implant ranged from 84% to 100%. Of the 10 621 hips, 370 were revised (3.5%), with aseptic loosening as the most frequent mode of failure. None of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants used to date met the full ten-year NICE benchmark of survival. A total of 13 studies showed satisfactory survival compared with the three-year NICE benchmark.
